The truth about e3 from feminazi perspective: even if all lead characters were women in all upcoming games, they would still complain about toxic masculinity. THAT is truth.
The truth about e3 from feminazi perspective: even if all lead characters were women in all upcoming games, they would still complain about toxic masculinity. THAT is truth.
Yup, because it is not about any declared causes or goals. It is about feeling righteous, important, insightful and, of course, signalling to other like minded idiots what a great and noble individual you are... whilst cloaking this proto-narcissism behind some issue to latch on to. The more cunning ones have a paycheck coming too and that's always nice.
A good old fashioned religious lynch mob or a band of sports hooligans exhibit the exact same psychological dynamics. Individuals in either of these are not really motivated by the religion or the sports..
The truth about e3 from feminazi perspective: even if all lead characters were women in all upcoming games, they would still complain about toxic masculinity. THAT is truth.
It's not about equality, or diversity, it never was. Not ever. It's about superiority and domination. Look at the reactions when it was revealed Dishonoured had a male *and* female lead role, the player gets to choose whether to play as Corvo or Emily, yet;
"You know guys, just because you have balls... doesn't mean you have balls"
"Dear You Little Shit, I'm sure you're busy writing your next letter explaining astrophysics to Stephen Hawking.."
And yeah, I absolutely agree, this climate of "political correctness" is getting worse and worse by the day - too many special snowflakes with their "hurt feelings"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/chess-grandmaster-nigel-short-shrill-feminists-have-made-me-a-misogynist-pantomime-villain-10335403.html
Despite all grand chess masters have been men doesn't mean that women aren't as good. It just means that white men are keeping good black women, who don't need no man, down.
Meh, both sides are wrong here. Here's the complete article:
He omits important elements as to why women may be quitting chess (sexism, lack of respect, other priorities, etc.) but feminists also act as if there's no difference between men and women while science has shown that men excel at strategy and tactics more so than women.
It's ironic, isn't it, that everyone considers it a fact that women are better at multitasking. Yet dare say men are better and creating strategies and tactical insight and somehow you're utterly sexist!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/chess-grandmaster-nigel-short-shrill-feminists-have-made-me-a-misogynist-pantomime-villain-10335403.html
Despite all grand chess masters have been men doesn't mean that women aren't as good. It just means that white men are keeping good black women, who don't need no man, down.
Meh, both sides are wrong here. Here's the complete article:
He omits important elements as to why women may be quitting chess (sexism, lack of respect, other priorities, etc.) but feminists also act as if there's no difference between men and women while science has shown that men excel at strategy and tactics more so than women.
It's ironic, isn't it, that everyone considers it a fact that women are better at multitasking. Yet dare say men are better and creating strategies and tactical insight and somehow you're utterly sexist!
Well, people today refuse to believe that there are differences between the sexes, but you'd have to be pretty fucking stupid to believe it.
Don't watch Last Week! Don't spoil yourself Oliver. Why you british tit? Oh god why you too Brutus
sar·casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Saw Anita's opressed fatface, puked in my mouth, erased the file with Peter Gutmann's Algorithm, degaussed the disk. Still fucking triggered men.
sar·casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Don't watch Last Week! Don't spoil yourself Oliver. Why you british tit? Oh god why you too Brutus
Are you kidding? John Oliver, Colbert and Jon Stewart all share the same view and Colbert already gave Sarkeesian a platform so why would Oliver be any different?
It's sad to see the same nonsense propping up again and again - especially when I know it's largely BS. For the past 10 years, I've always played a female character in MMOs and I've never ever received any abuse or crude remarks, even if made my character very sexy looking. It's completely the opposite: I got loads more help, often unasked for, received free gifts - sometimes even stuff you had to pay real money for. If 10 years of this has given me ZERO examples, how bad can it be for real women?
Unless, of course, their behavior is what triggers the response. And THAT is where things get a little more interesting, is it not? Many of these offended women have very thin skins and provoke people into anger exactly by responding forcefully where a laid back attitude would disarm the situation. But of course ... they're not interested in disarming, are they? That won't make them any money
but to be honest, the main point of the story is a real issue and the 'gamergate' bullshit is only mentioned in passing as an example
most people concerned with the actual issue aren't that knowledgeable nor interested about the attention-seeking professional victimhood of a gamer subculture.
Well it sure did put me off when he showed those 2 Killallmen advocates.
Thought they did more research and a very poor choice when the topic is mostly revenge porn.
Ah well...
When I noticed the video popping up among my subscriptions with a humongous amount of red in the rating bar, I was prepared for something controversial/or just very superficial... but I sure as hell wasn't expecting to see the happy duo in there.
Bah! Literally LastWeekTonight
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Oh god why you too Brutus 
