NFOHump.com :: View topic -

Page 4 of 4

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4

[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist

Posts: 8374

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 02:09 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

just so you know... the screenshot isn't show 4 movies being watched at the same time.. its 4 movies being encoded..

ManMountain

Posts: 793

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 02:43 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Each preview window you see in that screenshot is a time period / segment of the same movie. What that screen shot is showing is using a combination of FAVC/multiple AviSynth scripts/QuEnc/HC to convert a single video file into segments and spreading the encoding process load across the cores. Once the individual segment conversions are complete, they are recombined to complete the process. The combo of these applications make the conversion quicker and makes use of a multicore system efficiently. An example of doing a similar conversion process but less efficiently would be to convert a movie file using Nero's NeroVision. It is making use of the cores, but not as well as the first example. Another example is to use the latest version of ConvertXtoDvd which does not utilise multicore (I have read that version 3.0 when out has been coded with multithreading in mind). To maximise the use of the cores effectively, I would have to run three instances of ConvertXtoDvd. TripleNine, What crazy statements are you going to make next? Last edited by ManMountain on Sun, 6th Jan 2008 11:52; edited 7 times in total

Profile
PM

swingman

Posts: 3602

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 03:13 Post subject:

ManMountain wrote:

What that screen shot is showing is using a combination of FAVC/AviSynth/QuEnc/HC to convert a single video file into segments and spreading the encoding process load across the cores. Once each individual segment conversion is complete, they are rejoined to complete the conversion process. The combo of these applications make the conversion quicker and makes use of a multicore system efficiently.

Now that is brilliant optimisation!

You sure love ram and apparently so do those encoders. Wink

Profile
PM

ManMountain

Posts: 793

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 03:31 Post subject:

swingman wrote:

Now that is brilliant optimisation!

I have to agree. I came across FAVC and all it's little goodies quite by accident on the ConvertXtoDvd forums ironically Smile

swingman wrote:

You sure love ram and apparently so do those encoders. Wink

With DDR2 memory prices being so cheap, I decided now was the best time to get 8GB. I picked up 4x2GB of OCZ PC2-6400C4 800MHz Reaper HPC Enhanced Bandwidth Edition Dual Channel DDR2 (OCZ2RPR800C44GK) memory for £210. Which was great value for money imho Smile

The RAM consumption is more due to how Vista's superfetch manages memory. It certainly eats it like candy Very Happy

Profile
PM

Lutzifer
Modzilla

Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 14:55 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

4 pages and he still doesnt get it, hahahahah www.psygamer.net ::::

[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist

Posts: 8374

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 15:43 Post subject:

ManMountain wrote:

Each preview window you see in that screenshot is a time period / segment of the same movie.

What that screen shot is showing is using a combination of FAVC/multiple AviSynth scripts/QuEnc/HC to convert a single video file into segments and spreading the encoding process load across the cores. Once the individual segment conversions are complete, they are recombined to complete the process. The combo of these applications make the conversion quicker and makes use of a multicore system efficiently.

An example of doing a similar conversion process but less efficiently would be to convert a movie file using Nero's NeroVision. It is making use of the cores, but not as well as the first example.

Another example is to use the latest version of ConvertXtoDvd which does not utilise multicore (I have read that version 3.0 when out has been coded with multithreading in mind).

To maximise the use of the cores effectively, I would have to run three instances of ConvertXtoDvd.

TripleNine, What crazy statements are you going to make next? Rolling Eyes

Great set of shots! It's interesting to see the difference between each application.

LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢

Posts: 73376
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱

Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 17:08 Post subject:

Lutzifer wrote:

4 pages and he still doesnt get it, hahahahah

My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.

wawrzul

Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland

Posted: Mon, 7th Jan 2008 14:27 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Oh, fuck no! Vista!

Profile
PM

ManMountain

Posts: 793

Posted: Mon, 7th Jan 2008 16:45 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Profile
PM

wawrzul

Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland

Posted: Tue, 8th Jan 2008 07:51 Post subject:

ManMountain wrote:

U lookin' at me?
WTF is my holy XP cross? Apage vista fanbois!

Profile
PM

nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member

Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada

Posted: Tue, 8th Jan 2008 07:58 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

BULLFUCKER!!!! asus z170-A \|\| core i5-6600K \|\| geforce gtx 970 4gb \|\| 16gb ddr4 ram \|\| win10 \|\| 1080p led samsung 27"

Profile
PM

wawrzul

Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland

Posted: Tue, 8th Jan 2008 08:23 Post subject:

nouseforaname wrote:

BULLFUCKER!!!!

Don't you know? Bulls are on parade, killing in the name of.

Profile
PM

ManMountain

Posts: 793

Posted: Tue, 8th Jan 2008 16:28 Post subject:

wawrzul wrote:

U lookin' at me?
WTF is my holy XP cross? Apage vista fanbois!

lol Fanboi's, gotta love 'em eh? Razz

Profile
PM

LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢

Posts: 73376
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱

Posted: Thu, 22nd Jan 2015 19:47 Post subject:

TripleNine wrote:

ManMountain wrote:

TripleNine wrote:

... is silly like quad core cpu.

You are joking right?

Not at all. I've been using a core 2 duo for a while now.

I did a lot of thing, making rar pack, uncompressing rar pack, making xvid or mpeg. Using tons of programs in the same times.

And I nerver saw both of core running at 100% in the same time

So what is the point to have multiple cores on the same cpu if the cores are never used at 100%? (or should I say, use at least at more than 51%)

Quad core is purely useless, to not say dualcore too. Just like sly is a joke, A TOTAL joke.
If we compare P4 with P4-d running at the same frequency, we can't see any performance boots. Same for the AMD.

Dualcore was supposed to get good in the future, they told us, the programmer will make their games/app to run faster on dualcore. We still wait to see this. I did my research about programing for dual-core and I have found out there IS NO programing for dual-core.

I guess on a quad-core, the cpu will use each core at 25% max Rolling Eyes

Just like a dual-core use each core at 50% max.
Rocket science?

100% + 100% = 200%
Just like 1 core + 1 core = 2 core

No here the formula

50% + 50% = 100%
core1 + core2 = dualcore

Here the formula for quadcore

25% + 25% + 25% +25% = 100%
core1 + core2 + core3 + core4= quadcore

Genius.

My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.

konkol84

Posts: 3694
Location: Po(o)land

Posted: Thu, 22nd Jan 2015 19:53 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Profile
PM

Bob Barnsen

Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney

Posted: Thu, 22nd Jan 2015 19:53 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

bullshit Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200

Profile
PM

StrEagle

Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans

Posted: Thu, 22nd Jan 2015 20:31 Post subject:

what's going on in here??

Lutzifer wrote:

and yes, mine is only average

Profile
PM

Page 4 of 4

All times are GMT + 1 Hour