Grand Theft Auto V
Page 109 of 708 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 108, 109, 110 ... 706, 707, 708  Next
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:08    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
That's how Max Payne 3 looks on consoles too. And the thing about draw distances is, if done right, there really isn't that much geometry detail as it seems. So I am not sure if a Max Payne looking at a favela in the distance is less complicated graphically than a city in the distance in GTA5. And in the case that Rockstar actually optimized their engine, they could achieve what they had in Max Payne 3.

But don't get an Xbox, just wait for the PC version a few months.

I didn't see MP3 on consoles, so I can't comment on that. I just don't understand the "looks a bit better than GTA4" comments. My eyes must be broken.
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:10    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:56; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:12    Post subject:
Buy a better PC.
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:14    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:56; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:16    Post subject:
4treyu wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Post some screenshots or links and I will tell you what I like or dislike about them. Smile


There's at least one in the GTA4 thread. Let me look for it and I'll edit and link to it Very Happy


Fuuuuuuuuu, they removed the ones I was talking about, so these I found on my HD will have to do, oh and please forgive the unwanted aliasing on those, I hadn't started to use a FXAA injector at that time Very Happy




Last edited by 4treyu on Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:24; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:17    Post subject:
Broken links :\
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:18    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:56; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:18    Post subject:
Really? Those are from postimg.org!
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:21    Post subject:
4treyu wrote:
Really? Those are from postimg.org!


Direct links from postimg don't work on this forum Wink
Only thumbs do.


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:22    Post subject:
Oh! I didn't know that. Let me fix it anyways.

EDIT: done.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:26    Post subject:
Those shots look terrible. Like the blacks are crushed, no color, same flat shading and terrible looking trees. Confused

The console shots from 5 look way better than these two.
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:33    Post subject:
Yet when I posted on the GTA4 thread the ones that got removed, which were using the exact same settings (except with proper AA) and which were very very similar to these you said, textually:

LeoNatan wrote:

These look best to be honest, and actually fit GTA4's world and story. All the color crapola, especially in the screenshots from the GTA forums linked previously are awful. There is one where they seemingly took all lighting to minimum and ramped up color saturation to the maximum.


That sounds almost the exact opposite of your current critique

Like Newman the postman (yeah yeah the Hindenburg tragedy) once said:

"Ohhhh the humanity!"

Laughing


Last edited by 4treyu on Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:35; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:35    Post subject:
Well 2.5 does look a tad less bright:



Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:36    Post subject:
Now that's more like it, that ICE 2.5 video looks amazing.
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:37    Post subject:
The brightness has nothing to do with what is wrong with ICEnhancer Wink
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:38    Post subject:
4treyu wrote:
Yet when I posted on the GTA4 thread the ones that got removed, which were using the exact same settings (except with proper AA) and which were very very similar to these you said, textually:

LeoNatan wrote:

These look best to be honest, and actually fit GTA4's world and story. All the color crapola, especially in the screenshots from the GTA forums linked previously are awful. There is one where they seemingly took all lighting to minimum and ramped up color saturation to the maximum.


That sounds almost the exact opposite of your current critique

Like Newman the postman (yeah yeah the Hindenburg tragedy) once said:

"Ohhhh the humanity!"

Laughing

What here contradicts what I said?

They look the best because they don't have all the usual ENB shit enabled. What of what I said here is not true? Look at the trees. Look at the niggas on the side - no diffuse shading at all, just flat. Where is the color in the "red" car?
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65077
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:40    Post subject:
Some ENBs look pretty decent as long as you heavily customize them, but the big problem is, the performance is already bad by default, so unless you enjoy playing games at 20-30fps (KC-way Razz) they're a no-go.

Hopefully GTA V won't require them since the game has a lighting system that works. Smile



edit:
This one for example is great in my opinion, but it literally destroys the framerate:

Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:40    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:

What here contradicts what I said?

They look the best because they don't have all the usual ENB shit enabled. What of what I said here is not true? Look at the trees. Look at the niggas on the side - no diffuse shading at all, just flat. Where is the color in the "red" car?


Sounds to me like we're not talking about the same screens Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:41    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Now that's more like it, that ICE 2.5 video looks amazing.

The motion blur looks retarded to me. Still nothing beats the per-object motion blur of Crysis 1. Shading is still bad (engine limitation that cannot be solved). But at least here there are colors. Smile

Max Payne 3 looks better than anything shown in this video.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:43    Post subject:
4treyu wrote:
Sounds to me like we're not talking about the same screens Laughing

I have no idea where that post is from. I say something about "color saturation". Do you know what that is? "There is one where they seemingly took all lighting to minimum and ramped up color saturation to the maximum. " sounds exactly like the ones you posted and is exactly what I said "Like the blacks are crushed, no color". Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:46    Post subject:
ixigia wrote:
so unless you enjoy playing games at 20-30fps (KC-way Razz) they're a no-go.

Wat you mean, there is motion blur so it makes sooo smooth



Laughing
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23123

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:54    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
4treyu wrote:
Sounds to me like we're not talking about the same screens Laughing

I have no idea where that post is from. I say something about "color saturation". Do you know what that is? "There is one where they seemingly took all lighting to minimum and ramped up color saturation to the maximum. " sounds exactly like the ones you posted and is exactly what I said "Like the blacks are crushed, no color". Laughing


You replied that on the GTA4 thread in response to a screen I posted that looked very much like the couple I posted today. So you obviously liked it better than most of the "crapola" you saw on gtaforums.com, which btw served as base for the awfulness of the successive ICEnhancer releases.

The bummer here is that the mentioned pic was removed Sad
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:54    Post subject:
I guess it comes down to personal preference, I still think that ICEnhancer stuff can look incredible - like in that 2.5 video and especially in the one ixi linked to as that one is, to me, simply jaw-dropping - but I understand engine limitations are inherent and can prevent it looking even better, no matter how many external hooks are used. All I know is that I'd love to have a rig capable of playing like that Very Happy

~edit~

That video from ixi reminded me of this (spoilered because huge!)

 Spoiler:
 


Last edited by sabin1981 on Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:58; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Thu, 15th Aug 2013 23:56    Post subject:
So I loaded the game up and it seems my memory of it was wrong. Texture quality is roughly the same; for as far as that matters in 4, as they're terribly bland.

Fuck knows why I remembered something better, since I never applied ICE or ENB at all. Maybe it's because of all the screenshots with those posted all the time, dunno Sad
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:00    Post subject:
It could just be something as innocuous as memory, mate, five years is a hell of a long time to remember something like texture and lighting quality in a game -- unless it's truly stand-out, like Crysis.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:00    Post subject:
But ENB does not really fix the problems discussed. Look at the videos above. Look at the faces of people or their clothes. No shading at all (shading is not shadows!!).

Shading without shadows:



(Shadow should have been cast from the nose, for example.)

Shadows without shading:



(If there was shading, the cube and spheroid surfaces would have been shades of gray.)

Tell me, which one of these do you see in the videos above?


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.


Last edited by LeoNatan on Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:01    Post subject:
Oh I don't expect ENB to fix the issues of the engine, I completely agree with you on that! But ENB/ICE most certainly does improve the world and car quality, which is what you see most of the time when playing anyhow.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:03    Post subject:
@sabin1981 This was a response to Paul who considered the possibility of ENB screenshots clouding his judgement. I think not. Laughing
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:24    Post subject:
I know what it is you dummy, I just had it wrong in my head Smile
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 16th Aug 2013 00:26    Post subject:
Even Red Dead Redemption uses a better shading model:



Perhaps you got confused with that? Smile
Back to top
Page 109 of 708 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 108, 109, 110 ... 706, 707, 708  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group