is there another site where you can look for release names at? i've noticed the hump doesn't seem to post these release names that you guys are putting out
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
Do you mean "Avatar 2009 DVDRip x264 AC3-LUSi"? It is just a non-scene DVD rip to a much superior codec, so quality is probably much superior, unless the encoder had no clue what he was doing.
the first avatar bluray has no 3d version on it anyway.
the 3d release will come christmas season this year or something I think.
not holding my breath for a 1080p release as I'll just go and buy the bluray next week.
I don't buy many movies but avatar is one bluray I want to have
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
i dont think it will be a problem, just a delay :/
Cohen wrote:
I'm a troll! well done, you caught me lying my ass off on a forum. I post pictures so that it makes you angry and that you wish you could have my awesome material things
dammit i want a 1080, and i was hoping to NOT have to wait too long for it.
im not buying the blu-ray just yet, because i suspect that cameron's going to add more footage and come out with an extended blu-ray eventually...and ill just get that one.
speaking of 3d, for 1: outtanames was joking about 3d glasses, obviously... for 2: blu-ray hasnt decided on a 3d standard yet, right? does anyone know if it'll be that polarized dealy like in the cinema, or will they go with shutter glasses? after seeing how flawlessly the polarized system works, and the great results it gives, im kinda hoping for that system... i havent used shutter glasses yet, and i really want too to see how they perform, but the idea of having a shutter system kinda bothers me a little bit - i wonder about eye-strain or if ill notice the flickering n shit, plus theres the likelihood that the glasses could break and then you're up shit creek (polarized could break too if you stood on em i guess, but theyre definately far more hardy)... too many 'moving parts' with the shutter system, i like the relatively simplistic nature of polarized glasses... even if the tech is more expensive overall...
Last edited by chiv on Fri, 9th Apr 2010 16:20; edited 1 time in total
The spec has nothing to do with the method your TV uses to deliver 3D to you. So 3D Blurays will work now on simple shatter glasses, and will work in the future, when VR eye monitors cost 50$.
Yep. They just ensure that a 3D Bluray compliant player can deliver the data of a stereoscopic sequence using HDMI. It is up to the TV/projector/etc. to actually take that data and display it using the method it is built around.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
