Or in other words, point out any other difference between rights and beliefs, other than the fact that the former are signed into legislature.
There are rights who are universal, like human rights and natural rights, who do not have to be signed into legislature to exist/ to be recognized. You can't have a civilized country without human right and natural rights. Yet a country where the residents don't belief in a god can be political and economical stable.
Or in other words, point out any other difference between rights and beliefs, other than the fact that the former are signed into legislature.
There are rights who are universal, like human rights and natural rights, who do not have to be signed into legislature to exist/ to be recognized. You can't have a civilized country without human right and natural rights. Yet a country where the residents don't belief in a god can be political and economical stable.
If they are dependent upon the recognition of others, they can never be universal, in order for rights to be natural, they would be forced upon every living entity by nature itself, and in order for rights to be universal, they would need to be infallible and absolute.
The fact of the matter is that rights are nothing more than idealizations, and all ideals are opinion based, otherwise they wouldn't be ideals, but rather parameters of nature.
Last edited by Nhiumewyn on Wed, 3rd Oct 2012 23:29; edited 1 time in total
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
