The video of the future.......super cards....
Page 1 of 1
smeengy




Posts: 6

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Dec 2004 21:25    Post subject: The video of the future.......super cards....
The battle for video supremasy is always raging .....ATI realeases somthing and nvidia is quickly behind....
The 64 bit systems evolving things like dule linkable video card are becoming available with new pci Express slots.....


..... http://tech-report.com/reviews/2004q4/sli/index.x?pg=1

have a look at this....the new sli tecnoligy will make a revolutionaty breaktrough in gaming....soon ati will intriduce duel brigable 512k cards with 700- 900 mhz vpu's...this is going to get crazzzzy...>!!!!

i wonder wath the price tag is going to be, and haw much for on of these new nforce 4 64 class pci express ddr2 and duel channel caple boards will cost....


upgading is a bitch.....
Back to top
TiTaN_KGB




Posts: 804
Location: Motherland!
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Dec 2004 22:40    Post subject:
Well this SLI was first introduced by 3Dfx and currecntly only nvidia cards of the 6800gt/ultra chip spec allow sli.

No ati cards are capable of this


For the Motherland!
Back to top
Saner




Posts: 6876
Location: Uk
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Dec 2004 22:41    Post subject:
My voodoo 2 SLI rocked Very Happy


ahhh those where the days Very Happy


ragnarus wrote:

I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?Smile

Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
Back to top
Accelleron




Posts: 1926

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Dec 2004 02:57    Post subject:
Those were the days?
For the guys over at 3dfxzone.it these still are the days:
http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1462


Back to top
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist



Posts: 8374

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 01:55    Post subject:
Lets not forget that 3dfx = nvidia.. well.. pretty much

As for SLI, I've seen the tests running first hand. Yes they are impressive, but they dont hold huge amounts over the old cards. Its much like multi core/proccessor systems and "64bit" tech. We will see nothing new until it is standard. Which for now it isnt, until XP64 (official) release we will have nothing.. don't jump to conclusions too soon, plenty of people still have tech waitting to be released..

*edit 2*
By standard I mean "mainstream" standard.. we have linux systems which can complie just for multicore/cpu and also 64bit, but that doesnt make it a standard as far as gamers are concerned.
Back to top
whoKnows
VIP Member



Posts: 2972

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 09:15    Post subject:
Another sli setup: http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20041130/index.html

But still, i don't see a single reason why sli technology should get widly accepted. 3dfx failed with it and nvidia will so too. They only brought back sli to win benchmarks, same like ati did with the x700 xt wich was only build as test samples to compete with the 6600gt. Sli is too expensive, the life cycle of a graphics chips these days is too short to buy two cards at once, and heat is also a problem, like the first article has mentioned.
Back to top
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist



Posts: 8374

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 16:50    Post subject:
whoKnows wrote:
Another sli setup: http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20041130/index.html

But still, i don't see a single reason why sli technology should get widly accepted. 3dfx failed with it and nvidia will so too. They only brought back sli to win benchmarks, same like ati did with the x700 xt wich was only build as test samples to compete with the 6600gt. Sli is too expensive, the life cycle of a graphics chips these days is too short to buy two cards at once, and heat is also a problem, like the first article has mentioned.


*agrees*
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 17:13    Post subject:
SLI is incredibly gay.

1.) WAY too expensive.
2.) Only advance is in speed, NOTHING in image quality.
3.) Nvidias SLI tech has a bunch of problems still, they can be fixed, but your average user would be stuck in the dark.

WHERE ARE THE REAL NEW CARDS. Not this gimmicky stupid shit that's going to last what, a generation or two of videocards?

And PS, nvidia != 3dfx, they actually competed at one time a very long time ago, then nvidia took the lead, 3dfx had problems, and nvidia brought them.


Yes, I am this nerdy Stop by and say hello
Back to top
Accelleron




Posts: 1926

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 17:34    Post subject:
Cheez-It wrote:
SLI is incredibly gay.

1.) WAY too expensive.
2.) Only advance is in speed, NOTHING in image quality.
3.) Nvidias SLI tech has a bunch of problems still, they can be fixed, but your average user would be stuck in the dark.

WHERE ARE THE REAL NEW CARDS. Not this gimmicky stupid shit that's going to last what, a generation or two of videocards?

And PS, nvidia != 3dfx, they actually competed at one time a very long time ago, then nvidia took the lead, 3dfx had problems, and nvidia brought them.


SLI's have their advantages.

For example, an SLI solution can increase performance by 50%, which is about what, 2 generations up and one class of cards down? This will play like the Radeon 10000 mid-class. Meaning that you can get one for $450 now, get the mobo etc. and have a stable, relatively future-proof platform for about $1200. Then add as much memory/hard drive/CPU as you can afford, and just bump those up every so often. Then in about a year, when you can get one of these for less than $100, get that and $300 in upgrades (better CPU and a bit of memory), and you get another year of playtime relatively on-the-cheap.


Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 18:37    Post subject:
SLI's have their advantages.

For example, an SLI solution can increase performance by 50%, which is about what, 2 generations up and one class of cards down? This will play like the Radeon 10000 mid-class. Meaning that you can get one for $450 now, get the mobo etc. and have a stable, relatively future-proof platform for about $1200. Then add as much memory/hard drive/CPU as you can afford, and just bump those up every so often. Then in about a year, when you can get one of these for less than $100, get that and $300 in upgrades (better CPU and a bit of memory), and you get another year of playtime relatively on-the-cheap.[/quote]

ATI's solution is much more interesting, I believe they are going to make it so that you can cross different models, as opposed to nvidia's, which have to be the same exact model.

Another thing, while raw power is nice, when games start taking advantage of new rendering techiniques and use new technologies, this techinique will immediately be obsolete, as these are still old cards, even if they are powerful. This is just a niche of the market, you need a brand new (expensive might I add) mobo, one of the TOP processors or the advantage will exponentially decrease as this setup needs a powerful CPU (cpu = bottleneck here), ram, and hard drive, then you need a 450$ vid card, and then 100$ more (let's be realistic, it will be around 300 or more, for these, they don't depreciate in value like that.......) to me that's just way to expensive for something that's going to be out of date as soon as a new generation of video cards comes out. completely pointless considering one of the cards gives excellent performance..
Back to top
Accelleron




Posts: 1926

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 19:20    Post subject:
I do agree that new rendering techniques will render these cards obsolete, but I must say that - even with my old ATI Rad9600Pro, I can enjoy most of the games of today at decent resolutions, with acceptable framerates.

As for depreciation, I'll take it literally. Last year's Dream card (as featured in PC Gamer 10-13 Holiday 2003) was the Radeon 9800 Pro 128 mb All-in-Wonder card. The price in PCG (usually accurate) was listed as $450. Now it's $235 shipped here...
Therefore we can safely conclude that top-range cards depreciate ~50% per year. It will therefore run at about $200-250 in 1 year, or $100 in 2. 1.5 year is the sweet spot here at $125-150.

In any case, kudos to nVidia for at least trying to resurrect SLI


Back to top
ollax
VIP Member



Posts: 2154
Location: Here today, Hell tomorrow!
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Dec 2004 11:18    Post subject:
I just orderd asus sli mb!
http://www.asus.com/products/mb/socket939/a8nsli-d/overview.htm

Gonna run it with dual ultras! just wish i had know about it comming so soon, then i would have waited before i baught this rig, this is going to be expensive! Very Happy But hey! its christmas and all other gifts but my own are cancelled:-)


Of all the things i've lost, i miss my mind the most!
"Ozzy Osbourne"
_ _ _ _ _
Back to top
Steve-O 2004




Posts: 2851

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Dec 2004 14:24    Post subject:
Accelleron wrote:
Those were the days?
For the guys over at 3dfxzone.it these still are the days:
http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1462



OMG, are they running Doom 3 on 2x 12MB Cards??? Razz Thats insane... yea the graphics look shit, but its still funny to see a very old card running a new game Razz
Back to top
Gh0UL




Posts: 212
Location: southern AZ, USA
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Dec 2004 16:35    Post subject:
considering these are two antique Voodoo2s the graphics look awesome. Cool


*avatar by R. K. Sloane*
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Dec 2004 17:10    Post subject:
Accelleron wrote:
I do agree that new rendering techniques will render these cards obsolete, but I must say that - even with my old ATI Rad9600Pro, I can enjoy most of the games of today at decent resolutions, with acceptable framerates.

As for depreciation, I'll take it literally. Last year's Dream card (as featured in PC Gamer 10-13 Holiday 2003) was the Radeon 9800 Pro 128 mb All-in-Wonder card. The price in PCG (usually accurate) was listed as $450. Now it's $235 shipped here...
Therefore we can safely conclude that top-range cards depreciate ~50% per year. It will therefore run at about $200-250 in 1 year, or $100 in 2. 1.5 year is the sweet spot here at $125-150.

In any case, kudos to nVidia for at least trying to resurrect SLI


I really don't think you can say that, they stop at a certain point, or else I would recommend my friend get a 3 year old ATI radeon 9700, but they're still expensive... they depreciate quickly but then slow....

I'm waiting for the next gen or maybe 1 more after that to laugh at all the asshats who fell for this bullshit again, it was already a flop after a short lived success with 3dfx... why don't you spend your money on something USEFUL...
Back to top
Hitman02
Banned



Posts: 709
Location: USA
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Dec 2004 17:52    Post subject:
stop complaing i am stuck with geforce 4600
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group