Windows 7 HDD Rating
Page 1 of 1
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 17:16    Post subject: Windows 7 HDD Rating
Why is it that Wihdows 7 Rating System, rates my HDD so low?

I mean, what kind of HDD would satisfy Windows Rating Index to its maximum?

Btw, this rating was made to the rig in my Sig.



He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 17:20    Post subject:
I'd assume a few 10,000 RPM SCSI-SSD hybrid server-grade drives in RAID will guarantee a maximum score. Not sure, don't have one of those at the moment. Razz
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 17:32    Post subject:
G.SKILL SSD Falcon 128GB SATA II 230/190Mbs-FM-25S2S-128GBF1 - €320
G.SKILL SSD Falcon 256GB SATA II 230/190Mbs-FM-25S2S-256GBF1 - €605

Only found these 2 in my usual stores, they are a bit expensive considering that by €320 I can purchase 3x1.5TB drives and that one has only 128 Gb, it isn''t even enough for my installed applications to run, I have roughly 500 Gb of installed applications in my windows partition.

In your opinion, is it worth it, or I rather wait another year for the release of bigger SSD drives?

Will I notice a major performance bump when compared to my 1.5TB 7200 RPM drive?


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 17:35    Post subject:
Do you really find your current setup as not enough? With such high prices, I'd actually buy something that is worthy of them, like 3x1.5TB (or more), and even that, do you really need so much space? Razz
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 17:54    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Do you really find your current setup as not enough? With such high prices, I'd actually buy something that is worthy of them, like 3x1.5TB (or more), and even that, do you really need so much space? Razz


I always need space, on average I download 100Gb a day, between HD movies, series, Lossless albums and other stuff.

Space is always needed, and I lose way to many time backing up stuff to DVDs.

On the other hand, I'm very obsessed about performance, and although my current system behaves better than what I expected, a lower benchmark is something that captivates my immediate attention.

Obviously I do not wish to be throwing money away for nothing, if I am to purchase one of these drives I expect to notice a major performance bump, not only a few extra point in a benchmark test that have no practical meaning whatsoever.

Also, the price/space ratio of this drives is a big turn off, a windows partition with less than 500 Gb is probably the only reason I will not purchase one of these SSD drives atm, unless of course there are bigger drives that I can order from anywhere outside my country.


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 17:58    Post subject:
SSD hybrids will only improve repeated access to small files. I don't think it is really worth the price asked. This is still a relatively new technology (commercially), thus the silly prices. Smile

Like you said, the only possible advantage would be for a system partition, because it would lead to faster boot time and faster execution system tasks. But for games, movies and shows the gains are very minimal. Smile If you can live with a 32GB system partition, perhaps buy one of these, but then you need to change the installation path of almost everything you install.
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:13    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
SSD hybrids will only improve repeated access to small files. I don't think it is really worth the price asked. This is still a relatively new technology (commercially), thus the silly prices. Smile

Like you said, the only possible advantage would be for a system partition, because it would lead to faster boot time and faster execution system tasks. But for games, movies and shows the gains are very minimal. Smile If you can live with a 32GB system partition, perhaps buy one of these, but then you need to change the installation path of almost everything you install.


Since the moment I power my Rig, until I'm fully logged on in Windows, some 30-40 seconds pass by, imo is quite insignificant considering that half that time is wasted on BIOS operations, which makes roughly 15-20 seconds booting Windows (which imo is very fast, and I doubt SSD drives would be much more faster than this), within the OS itself I can rarely notice any lag time on disk access, something that I noticed quite often in my old rig.

I will probably purchase a NAS and other 3 or 4 - 1.5 TB drives, that probably is money well spent.


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10805
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:18    Post subject:
Ronhrin wrote:


I always need space, on average I download 100Gb a day, between HD movies, series, Lossless albums and other stuff.


Your an ISP's worst nightmare Laughing 100GB is a hell of a lot.


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:22    Post subject:
Newty182 wrote:
Ronhrin wrote:


I always need space, on average I download 100Gb a day, between HD movies, series, Lossless albums and other stuff.


Your an ISP's worst nightmare Laughing 100GB is a hell of a lot.


I pay for it Wink


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:26    Post subject:
Lol there was talk around here that ISPs might limit put limits or caps on the bandwidth. Needless to say they were very quickly taken down from their high horses with a lot of people threatening to stop paying, but still, got me sacred for a while Laughing Either uTorrent or Newsleecher are constantly downloading something. Imagine having to pace it. Laughing
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:40    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Lol there was talk around here that ISPs might limit put limits or caps on the bandwidth. Needless to say they were very quickly taken down from their high horses with a lot of people threatening to stop paying, but still, got me sacred for a while Laughing Either uTorrent or Newsleecher are constantly downloading something. Imagine having to pace it. Laughing


Users like us are probably only between 4% and 8% of the totality of internet users, putting the piracy issue aside, when considering traffic alone, we are well within the parameters estimated by ISPs when they make their overall traffic assessments, most users only want to check their email, read some articles or purchase stuff online and occasionaly watch some youtube videos.


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:47    Post subject:
Oh yeah, in Israel, 99.99% of net traffic is piracy. Wink That's why they are doing nothing about the issue, they'd be out of work. Very Happy
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:52    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Oh yeah, in Israel, 99.99% of net traffic is piracy. Wink That's why they are doing nothing about the issue, they'd be out of work. Very Happy


Well,it can't be 99%, you have to consider the amount of email and http traffic will always be dominant, if you said 50% it will probably still be a very high estimate, but still, I didn't knew piracy was so high in Israel.


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:55    Post subject:
You could just photoshop the picture to save cash rather than buy more hardware Wink


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 18:58    Post subject:
Ronhrin wrote:
iNatan wrote:
Oh yeah, in Israel, 99.99% of net traffic is piracy. Wink That's why they are doing nothing about the issue, they'd be out of work. Very Happy


Well,it can't be 99%, you have to consider the amount of email and http traffic will always be dominant, if you said 50% it will probably still be a very high estimate, but still, I didn't knew piracy was so high in Israel.

Hmm,

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_sof_pir_rat-crime-software-piracy-rate

It find it had to believe actually lol.
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 19:02    Post subject:
Anthirs wrote:
You could just photoshop the picture to save cash rather than buy more hardware Wink


Haven't thought of that one before, you're probably right, it's done!



Laughing


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 19:06    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Ronhrin wrote:
iNatan wrote:
Oh yeah, in Israel, 99.99% of net traffic is piracy. Wink That's why they are doing nothing about the issue, they'd be out of work. Very Happy


Well,it can't be 99%, you have to consider the amount of email and http traffic will always be dominant, if you said 50% it will probably still be a very high estimate, but still, I didn't knew piracy was so high in Israel.

Hmm,

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_sof_pir_rat-crime-software-piracy-rate

It find it had to believe actually lol.




32% Laughing

This Windows 7 snipping tool is very useful! Smile


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 19:08    Post subject:
Ronhrin wrote:


32% Laughing

This Windows 7 snipping tool is very useful! Smile

Yes, something's not right! Laughing

Ronhrin wrote:
Haven't thought of that one before, you're probably right, it's done!

 Spoiler:
 


Laughing

Hey he said "Photoshop" not pain t Laughing
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 19:15    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Ronhrin wrote:


32% Laughing

This Windows 7 snipping tool is very useful! Smile

Yes, something's not right! Laughing

Ronhrin wrote:
Haven't thought of that one before, you're probably right, it's done!

 Spoiler:
 


Laughing

Hey he said "Photoshop" not pain t Laughing


It was photoshop Laughing

What I wonder is how the hell can a country like Armenia rate 1st with 93% of piracy, I mean, no offense to them but I bet half of them doesn't even know how to read.

I agree with you, something is very wrong with that list.


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
heckknow




Posts: 541

PostPosted: Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:11    Post subject:
if you really want to you can manually change the score if you're not happy with it (use text/xml editor):

C:\Windows\Performance\WinSAT\DataStore\2009-08-05 19.15.47.047 Disk.Assessment (Initial).WinSAT.xml

of course, the '2009-08-05 19.15.47.047 ' will be different for you. Very Happy
Back to top
ktorpil




Posts: 58
Location: Ankara, Turkey
PostPosted: Sat, 15th Aug 2009 22:50    Post subject:
Ronhrin wrote:


What I wonder is how the hell can a country like Armenia rate 1st with 93% of piracy, I mean, no offense to them but I bet half of them doesn't even know how to read.



If they knew how to read, they would read some history books and wouldn't go around advertising their fake-ass "genocide" Smile

So 7.9 (or 8 ) is the maximum possible score you can achieve? I have a couple of WD 740GD Raptors @ RAID0. I wonder what score I'll get...
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34974
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 16th Aug 2009 05:00    Post subject:
7.9 is the highest, not that the Windows score is that important but it shows a decent and quick performance overview, I get a 7.3 for CPU and RAM with 7.4 for both GPU tests via Catalyst 9.8 (Forcing 3D clocks via the tray tool icon, otherwise the score is 7.1)

Due to SSD technology and Veloci-Raptor 10.000 RPM discs my Samsung Spinpoint F1 only scores a 5.9 (What I had with Vista, which was the highest possible actually.) so that's where I am at the moment, not that bad though. Smile
(Samsung apparently plans a F3 revamp version starting at 500GB and up but they want to go to 1.5 or even 2 TB eventually, might be a nice upgrade as they'll also be a bit faster due to tech improvements, not close to a real SSD although those cost quite a bit plus the degradation of that flash memory they use - albeit it'll still last 3 - 5 years - however.)
Back to top
ktorpil




Posts: 58
Location: Ankara, Turkey
PostPosted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 00:53    Post subject:
I also get 5.9 at Vista. The performance assesment thingy looks for only the main system partition, right? I have the raptors there. I also have a single velociraptor on another partition and 2 generic sammy 500gb disks at a second raid0 array. I don't think I can use up it's full potential since it is connected via firewire but I also have a 1.5 TB external Maxtor HDD which essentially is two 750GB disks strapped in a Raid 0 array inside the enclosure.

Why do you need to force 3d clocks? My GTX 295 switches automatically to 3d whenever I run the tool (i confirm it by looking at the lcd of my g19 which has rivatuner monitoring running). Also the difference between scores when you don't, WTF? Yet another reason not to buy ati I guess (X1900XTX was my last Ati Smile )

I'm intrigued by those sammy HDDs you're talking about. If the F3s will be 10k RPM and competitively priced, then I'll really consider getting them instead of another velociraptor since all WD disks other than the raptors and velociraptor I owned during the course of time either failed or were extremely noisy and overheating. Not the same case with sammys though, whisper quiet and reliable.

I think SSDs are extremely overpriced and useless in practice. The ones that are slightly faster than the velociraptor use old technology, prone to failure and have a short lifespan (considering I have the raptors at raid0 ever since my P4C800 Deluxe days and they NEVER failed once). And the newer ones that make a considerable difference are outrageously overpriced and have ridiculously low capacity. I'm not even thinking about getting an SSD for my desktop but an OCZ Vertex Turbo 120GB for my laptop would be nice (if it wasn't around 1.150TL ($800) and if I wouldn't have to carry additional external drives which add to the weight since 120GB is nowhere near all the work software I currently have on the laptop)
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34974
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Mon, 17th Aug 2009 04:19    Post subject:
It runs at 2D clocks during some less strenous tests and at 3D clocks during some of the more demanding ones so switching to full 3D speeds does improve score a bit, might be fixed by ATI in later drivers, forcing AA also interferes a bit with 3D measurments and Aero tests from what I've noticed so that's the reason that setting affects the performance rating. Smile

Other than that I have no idea yet if my next upgrade will be a ATI 5000 series or a NVIDIA 300 series card, not really important for me to upgrade yet even though ATI will release their next cards in late September from the latest reports whereas NVIDIA takes things a bit calmer and will have their cards ready in Q1 2010 sometime, need to wait for both to be available before deciding on price/performance, pretty clear to me that a single 5870 or what it'll be called won't really match a GT 380 or what those will be called if both cards end up roughly twice as fast as the last generation ones, although performance will be quite close and then it's up to drivers to further optimize and improve the situation.
(ATI Catalyst 9.8 really helps in certain titles whereas it has caused a few issues in others, of course the 190.xx serie for NVIDIA has recieved quite a few complaints as well so many use either the 182 or 186 version drivers.)

EDIT: And yeah current SSD technology still needs to mature a bit more but it's developing extremely fast.
(They're soon at the maximum 300 MB transfer rate that SATA 2 can handle, at least for certain situations, SATA 3 is getting closer though as is USB 3 for external devices.)

From what I know thouh the Samsung Spinpoint F3 will be more of a revamped F1 so 7200 RPM or what it's called but I guess it'll be .11 instead of .10 plus various optimizations, of those mentioned it'll only use two platters, perhaps three for the 1.5 or 2TB versions once available so speeds are further improved.
(Samsung targets a rough 30% speed increase from the F1 models, those are around the fastest high-capacity drivers available and quite good plus price friendly compared to market brands like Western Digital, Maxtor and Hitachi.)

http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,691403/Samsung-Spinpoint-F3-with-500-GByte-platters-and-7-200-rpm-introduced/News/
Back to top
PirateXXX
Banned



Posts: 217
Location: Tortuga
PostPosted: Wed, 19th Aug 2009 23:25    Post subject: Re: Windows 7 HDD Rating
Ronhrin wrote:
Why is it that Wihdows 7 Rating System, rates my HDD so low?

I mean, what kind of HDD would satisfy Windows Rating Index to its maximum?

Btw, this rating was made to the rig in my Sig.



I can't believe that there are suckers out there still not figuring out that all those MS Vista/Windows 7 tests are bullshit made to force you spend money on new hardware. Same applies for Futuremark and other bullshit benchmark tools. There is always some retard with nitrogen cooled PC scoring gazillion points more than the rest of us but that doesn't mean I'm going to buy thousands of dollars of new hardware just to see my score pleases MS. Why do you need anything else except Windows XP? DX10 and DX11 are total shit maing games run slower with same graphics as in DX9. When I heard that Vista 64-bit needs 40GB for installation I almost snapped out. XP 64-bit install is 4GB so please enlighten me why do I need ten times bigger OS to run games slower with exactly the same graphics?
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Wed, 19th Aug 2009 23:28    Post subject:
agree about rating crap, but for the rest

Back to top
ktorpil




Posts: 58
Location: Ankara, Turkey
PostPosted: Thu, 20th Aug 2009 01:44    Post subject: Re: Windows 7 HDD Rating
PirateXXX wrote:
Why do you need anything else except Windows XP? DX10 and DX11 are total shit maing games run slower with same graphics as in DX9. When I heard that Vista 64-bit needs 40GB for installation I almost snapped out. XP 64-bit install is 4GB so please enlighten me why do I need ten times bigger OS to run games slower with exactly the same graphics?


You sir, are as ignorant as you're broke.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Operating Systems
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group