I don't like atheist crusaders as much as religious fanatics
non believers who act all superior nose up high are the most ridiculous people on the planet
they just don't realize it
everyone is entitled to his own system belief, whether the universe was created or happened randomly is not for anyone to answer because simply we still just don't know enough
evolution is true as it only takes a look to realize that life evolves and changes in so many ways not just one way of transforming into a more fitting creature but also as a more conscious and in order being
just because you know how something works doesn't make it any less impressive and worthy of awe and appreciation
the thing here is that if a brain grows far from any religious belief system and is exposed to it after maturing he'd find it to be far fetched and ridiculous, not like one who has been told about jesus every single day ever since he started talking, repetition results in submission to the repeated so called "truth"
again here as I said it's all a matter of point of view and perspective of things and no matter how hard we try we as human beings cannot escape constant ideas conflicts for that we have not yet reached a state of evolution where we are able to geniunely understand, we're still chaotic incomplete diapers shitting babies and the majority of us just can't handle the complexe lives modern societies require etc
fuuuuuu TL;DR this shit doesn't make sense it might be alcohol lolololololol
I don't like people who have double standards. Religious idiots spreading their shit everywhere is fine (because we have to be tolerant toward all) while atheists fighting for sanity is considered lack of tolerance or something similar. In the same manner that religion has found its way into hymns, poems and phrases. If cringe every time I hear "in god we thrust" or "god bless America" or similar phrases in Hebrew (there are countless such, in Hebrew, English and surely others), then fuck tolerance and fuck entitlement of "to each his own!" Let these religious nuts cringe every time someone argues otherwise than their bullshit fairy tales. Because of that constant try to be considerable has led Europe, and especially the England, into what it is today. No. I prefer that sanity and thought prevails, even at the cost of stepping on the right for people to believe in fairy tales and bullshit. Enough is enough.
that's the idea even if you kill every last religious man you think you'd establish a utopia? it'd be only to please your own belief system, people will always find things to fight about from PS3 vs 360 to allah vs jesus, same shit on different scales , life is all but a struggle
we're not getting out of this circle anytime soon, unless we evolve into something better than this stupid bag of meat or we become one (literally)
The only difference being no one gets hurt over the PS3 vs 360 argument, while religious nuts fly planes into skyscrapers, suicide-explode in markets and pubs, women get beheaded after being accused of seducing their rapists and homosexuals get stoned to death (oooh what a tragedy, I only listed muslim religious nuts deeds, my mistake, sorry to everyone offended ). You can put your head in the sand and say "removing religion won't help at all," or say something silly like "your examples only show the extremists," but the simple truth is I don't care for the "collateral damage" (the peaceful religious).
thing is I never defended religion matter of fact I am completely against it, doesn't mean I can't look into their beliefs, state and motives to understand better, I don't say you should, I'm a morally gray person and the least of my worries is human life
I just have this thing to see things from all the different perspective
as for PS3 vs 360 arguments, cut the internet and bring fanboys to a stadium to argue about it and you got yourself a miniwar , except religion's arguments are the biggest scale there is and the means are incredibly violent as you said planes into buildings and suicide boombers
there is no doubt scientific path is the most reasonable one there is, but for how long
I'm just a crazy man
there is no doubt scientific path is the most reasonable one there is, but for how long
You kidding, right? You say that sentence as if there is any other "path".
what about the jesus path, allah's path and buda's
all im saying is, if we kill them all for what we believe in, what difference is there between an atheist today and a crusader a thousand years ago, they too believed in their christian utopia and anyone who doesn't submit to their beliefs should be killed for there's no other right way but theirs.
atheist war should an intellectual one, of course doesn't mean we shouldn't plan solid physical defense systems first, and you can't expect everyone to see things your way, for everyone is shaped differently
as for me personally I am an atheist but I just don't give a shit about humanity or their fate, religious or not religious I want my groceries, alcohol and video games and I'll go back to my home (which is kinda in the middle of the woods)
I live, I enjoy art and entertainment for I have no power to meddle with the world
iNatan wrote:
FireMaster wrote:
as for PS3 vs 360 arguments, cut the internet and bring fanboys to a stadium to argue about it and you got yourself a miniwar
Sure, but those that would attend that fight and/or war would be crazy nuts as well, so the more they kill each other the better.
those who will attend will mostly be 12-17 years old so that's their little argument they chose to settle with violence, that was just an example that people will always argue just about anything, the bigger the scale the more violent is the impact of the argument (ex from blackeyes to planes onto buildings)
PS I don't suppose I'm making much sense but know this: I love you.
I say we go with a totalitarian imperium ala Warhammer 40,000 based around science, and go for a xenophobic crusade around the galaxy. For the Emperor!
I say we go with a totalitarian imperium ala Warhammer 40,000 based around science, and go for a xenophobic crusade around the galaxy. For the Emperor!
first we go on a leveling up crusade against religious creatures so we can warm up a little, think of it as a tutorial level
fuck, I really was drunk[/spoiler]
Last edited by FireMaster on Fri, 20th Mar 2009 20:55; edited 1 time in total
I say we go with a totalitarian imperium ala Warhammer 40,000 based around science, and go for a xenophobic crusade around the galaxy. For the Emperor!
Leo from now on you have a special place in my soul
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
). You can put your head in the sand and say "removing religion won't help at all," or say something silly like "your examples only show the extremists," but the simple truth is I don't care for the "collateral damage" (the 
, except religion's arguments are the biggest scale there is and the means are incredibly violent as you said planes into buildings and suicide boombers
