I know there are worse things than a site that isn't valid XHTML/CSS (as long it still works in non-IE browsers), but since there are those two little buttons on the bottom right of each page claiming the code is validated by W3 I think you really should take care of using valid code.
True, 100% valid XHTML can be quite a pain sometimes but if you use those "valid" buttons from W3 your code has to be valid. Or remove the buttons.
The CSS errors aren't that bad either but still they should be corrected when using the valid-button.
After being a smart ass I also wanted to say your site is the best NFO-database I know of. Thanks for reading.
buren, here have a pill. You wont care about valid CSS after that
BTW, for anyone that cares. A necessary evil when you deal with more browsers at once, especially if IE is one of them. Some things could have been done a different way i suppose, but we took heart on operability not valid-ness (if we stuck to that IE should have been crucified a long time ago)
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
