| Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 15:50 Post subject: Peter Jackson's King Kong Trailer |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 15:55 Post subject: |
|
|
it looks alright although i'm not a fan of the cast and some of the "action" animations look pretty bad.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GP Force
Posts: 861
Location: Hair today, gone tomorrow
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 16:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sublime wrote: | | it looks alright although i'm not a fan of the cast and some of the "action" animations look pretty bad. |
Let's See
Director: Peter Jackson (nuff said)
Composer: Howard Shore (nuff said)
Not sure about the actors, and jack black 
CGI, bad in a pj movie, this will be the day.... Wasn't WETA working on King Kong 
CGI despite what some people might say, is awesome, and has been ever since 1988 (The Abyss) GOod directors knows how to use it well. Yes it's not the directors who create's CGI, but they are the one's who knows how to use their tools (well hopefully)
LOTR, and let's say ROTK has the best CGI so far, will probably hold a few years being the best CGI flick movie.
Good CGI for me is:
You can't spot if it's CGI or not, but even if you can it doesn't mean it's bad, Olifants in ROTK looked so real, yet some "people" said it was CGI, sure it's easy to say that, since you wouldn't build 2 tons of robots running around
When CGI is in motion and the movements/animations looks real
Directors working close up with the CGI team,Peter Jackson, James Cameron (missed any?)
Movies who has GREAT CGI:
LOTR trilogy
The abyss ..yes it's from 1986
Terminator 2 (still going strong)
Sin City
I know I missed a few other title's, help me out?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 16:35 Post subject: |
|
|
How long until this hits theaters? cause i remember seing some pretty bad cgi in the first lotr trailers... and they looked awesome in the end... so depending on when it gets release, they gotta still be working on it..
anyway, only reason i would go see it, would be JB.. it's not really my kind of film, but i do love the jables...
BATMAN: What weighs six ounces, sits in a tree and is very dangerous?
ROBIN: A sparrow with a machine gun!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 16:47 Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="GP Force"]
I know I missed a few other title's, help me out?[/quote]
Sky captain and the world of tomorrow
Shrek 1 and 2
Spy kids 2 and 3d
star wars 1 2 3
Spiderman 2
[quote="GP Force"]Olifants in ROTK looked so real, yet some "people" said it was CGI, sure it's easy to say that, since you wouldn't build 2 tons of robots running around[/quote]
ROTK was a cgi mess; from the beginning to the end. The battle scenes were horrendous. You can spot who was cgi and who wasn't (they just looked fake). You could have easily spotted the blue screen and not to mention the very last scene when everyone cheers these dwarfs.
[quote="GP Force"]Director: Peter Jackson (nuff said)[/quote]
So we should expect a total fuck up then?
PJ, can't do action. He makes it boring. Troy had better fight scenes.
He can't do drama because, like Lucas, he cannot direct very well.
We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year, running over the same old ground. What have we found? The same old fears. Wish you were here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 16:50 Post subject: |
|
|
I dont particularly like jack black  and the CGI in this trailer looked pretty bad, particularly the dinosaurs and the car. Still i'm sure it wont look like that in the end but at the mo i'd expect much better animations given todays' technology. The film other than these 2 points looked quite good, the settings, costumes and atmosphere looked pretty nice.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 16:59 Post subject: |
|
|
is it me or does the monkey looks smaller then original
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Under
Posts: 667
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 16:59 Post subject: |
|
|
Looking forward too see it ... Gonna be a great movie !
Best PICKUP LINE :
"Hey, does this rag smell like chloroform to you?"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 20:19 Post subject: |
|
|
they got till december.. so plenty of time shining up the cgi.
dust.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GP Force
Posts: 861
Location: Hair today, gone tomorrow
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 20:58 Post subject: |
|
|
| Injurious wrote: | | GP Force wrote: |
I know I missed a few other title's, help me out? |
Sky captain and the world of tomorrow
Shrek 1 and 2
Spy kids 2 and 3d
star wars 1 2 3
Spiderman 2
| GP Force wrote: | | Olifants in ROTK looked so real, yet some "people" said it was CGI, sure it's easy to say that, since you wouldn't build 2 tons of robots running around |
ROTK was a cgi mess; from the beginning to the end. The battle scenes were horrendous. You can spot who was cgi and who wasn't (they just looked fake). You could have easily spotted the blue screen and not to mention the very last scene when everyone cheers these dwarfs.
| GP Force wrote: | | Director: Peter Jackson (nuff said) |
So we should expect a total fuck up then?
PJ, can't do action. He makes it boring. Troy had better fight scenes.
He can't do drama because, like Lucas, he cannot direct very well. |
CGI bad in ROTK, messy, pj being as lucas.......................................................................... I see you have a new avatar..........................look, it's a cat in the alley...
I will not speak of pj and rotk anymore, im tired of your  la la la la la 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
| Posted: Tue, 28th Jun 2005 21:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| Oddmaker wrote: | | they got till december.. so plenty of time shining up the cgi. |
Yep was just about to say that. It's June and the movie comes out in December. CGI isn't finished yet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 00:41 Post subject: |
|
|
I have to say it looks promising. We shall see.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 01:52 Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Cheez-It"]I have to say it looks promising.[/quote]
yep :D
We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year, running over the same old ground. What have we found? The same old fears. Wish you were here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 03:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 16:09; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GP Force
Posts: 861
Location: Hair today, gone tomorrow
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 03:46 Post subject: |
|
|
| Yondaime wrote: | | skidrow wrote: | | is it me or does the monkey looks smaller then original |
Yes! I definitely tought so aswell...
I tought the movie itself looked quite nice though. I really like the atmosphere and the settings. |
I thought there was inconsistancies between the size of kong in that vid. in some scenes he's huge but then in others he's just big |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 03:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree, I think P.J. is a very talented director, with a vision, and a whole damn lot of stamina. I agree that his style isn't always the ... most appealing, but to say he's a bad director is to miss out on a lot of what he does.
I really love the photography, and consistent own character he implements in his movies - I do dislike a lot of his choices, but that is never the same as if he's bad at what he does.
I can't imagine that it was Peter's idea to do most things we disliked about his movies - I blame Philippa Boyens for most of it in ROTK(especially the love/legolas superhero stuff).
Can't forgive him for adding that mutant orc though, that almost ruined the entire ROTK experience for me - I really, really disliked it.
As for CGI - there's an expression; "If all you have is a hammer, all the world will look as a bunch of nails" - meaning, if you put so much attention into being disturbed by CGI, all you will find is how bad the CGI is, etc.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Griffon
Banned
Posts: 1875
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 04:51 Post subject: |
|
|
The CGI looked fine to me... the fuck is your problem ?
About Hitman: Movie (2007)
Vin Diesel is a hardcore gamer, and absolutely loves the Hitman series. For that reason I have faith that he wont destroy the movie.
Response: Well, Uwe Boll probably loved the Alone in the Dark games.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 06:15 Post subject: |
|
|
when you can see the difference between CGI and normal action sequences it just ruins it. Like I said, i expect better now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 10:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
julas
Posts: 6
Location: eu
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 12:11 Post subject: |
|
|
CGI - what this contraction means?
If Pacman ever affected us as kids, we'd all be running around darkened rooms, munching strange pills and listening to repetitive music...
|Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, 1989|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 12:29 Post subject: |
|
|
i thought the car worked just well...and i really got see more of the movie to judge about the cgis...
jesus christ was a gangsta rapper. they killed him. he came back and made a platinum album.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 29th Jun 2005 13:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| julas wrote: | | CGI - what this contraction means? |
Computer Generated Image. The scene where you see kong grab the woman he looks huge but then before and after he doesnt look at big. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
julas
Posts: 6
Location: eu
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Jun 2005 01:13 Post subject: |
|
|
thx
i dont like CGI...
If Pacman ever affected us as kids, we'd all be running around darkened rooms, munching strange pills and listening to repetitive music...
|Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, 1989|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Jun 2005 15:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Jack Black is so wrong for this movie!
animations look pretty awful... come on! too much computer now a days... Jurassic Park from 91-92 had better dinosaurs!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 30th Jun 2005 18:39 Post subject: |
|
|
You expect them to build a giant animatronic gorilla?
Why not go watch the original king kong movies if you hate CGI so much.
"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D
"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Last edited by AnimalMother on Thu, 30th Jun 2005 19:20; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
Thing is when im able to watch it im gonna be watching Jack Black and wait till he does or says something funny but i doubt its gonna happen in this movie 
