| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 14:48 Post subject: Starforce 4 |
|
 |
Now that would really suck... they say Battlefield 2 will be protected by starforce 4.
Fuck.
11th "Thou shalt not flash"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 15:19 Post subject: |
|
|
I hope so
| Quote: | | PC awesome button = Uninstall! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 15:46 Post subject: |
|
|
And why do u hope that?If i may ask.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 16:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| waxier wrote: |
And why do u hope that?If i may ask. |
The more attention the more skilled 1337 old school crackers are tempted to return to pcisogame scene and end this madness .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 16:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The more attention the more skilled 1337 old school crackers are tempted to return to pcisogame scene and end this madness . |
I hope u are right, but i'm not so sure about the return of the old school crackers, some are arrested and the others don't want to get envolve again (that's what i think).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 16:48 Post subject: |
|
|
I dont mind starforce, I mean all crappy commercial console ported games use it anyway 
| Quote: | | PC awesome button = Uninstall! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 17:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I dont mind starforce, I mean all crappy commercial console ported games use it anyway |
I don't get it, in which side are u?The devs one or the let's first try and then buy(us) one? We are not all rich persons, i can't buy every game, i only buy the ones i tryed and i like. I buy games, but i can't buy everyone i want.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 17:22 Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Kamikaze666 in one thing - as fare as console conversions go, I don't mind about their protection, cos I do not play them anyway.
The point is however, that all games are cracked and you are free to choose whether they are worth paying for or not.
11th "Thou shalt not flash"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 18:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Is Starforce 4 even released? This is just bulshit, BF2 MAY be protected with SF3, but not with SF4,SF5 or SF10
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seron
Posts: 379
Location: swedenenenenenenene
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 18:58 Post subject: |
|
|
i doubt we'll see SF4 anytime soon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 19:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Who gives a shit, Battlefield 2 is for multiplayer only really anyway.
"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D
"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2005 19:11 Post subject: |
|
|
I think that SF4 will not be released for a long time... Just lets think... why should they release... when SF3 is doing a great job... and crackers are far from owning it.... SF4 maybe just SF3 with Win 64 support... if that's the case... I think that SF4 is possible... otherwise we'll not see it too soon... because there's no need...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kosmiq
Posts: 2304
Location: Somewhere
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spankie
VIP Member
Posts: 2958
Location: Belgium
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2005 10:22 Post subject: |
|
|
ea have deal with macrovision, so it will be safedisc
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 22nd May 2005 04:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Why does this thread even exist?
Are there any actual tech specs on StarForce 4? No? Then what difference does it make?
The fact that they might increment the version number does not really change much of anything else. Assuming that SF4 is going to be any more complex than SF3 is unwarranted. They'll increment the digit when it suits them. It will suit them when they need to resurrect waning sales. That's pretty much all it's for. The distinction between StarForce 3.x.whatever and StarForce 4.blah.monkey is completely arbitrary.
bigger number != better software
If they figure out that more companies will buy it if they call it StarForce Asspork, they'll call it StarForce Asspork...
Maybe the fact that you're intimidated by the number 4 more than 3 is reason enough for them to switch. Good psyops.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2005 19:06 Post subject: |
|
|
Considering how little inroad has been made into SF3 by the regular scene groups I don't think a SF4 is required.
The catalogue of games protected by SF3 and uncracked grows regularly, the cracked library grows a lot more slowly, so SF3 is fine.
Going by SCCT if they want to make the game untouchable from the point of view of the regular crackers they're fine using that same version with the right options on anyway.
SF4 will be a name and not much else to be honest, the 3.4.71.19 version of SF3 was radically different from the earlier versions and could have been described as a SF4 as it introduced a new VM along with a load of new anti-copying features.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 25th May 2005 15:00 Post subject: |
|
|
BF2 will use Safedisch. Its confirmed.
Don't worry.
PS. The ONLY reason I dislike Starforce is what it does to my computer.
Im buying BF2. And now I can play it without the CD in my DVD-rom. That is a luxury... because its sooo annoying to switch the darn cd everytime I have to play. (I use my DVD-rom for films almost daily.)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
.
