These two fellas worked on Kon-Tiki! That was a pretty cool movie, with some really good oceanic special effects/environmental awesomesauce. I'm quite hopeful for this one..I mean, can't be worse than #4
Isn't Will Turner suppose to be the captain of the Flying Dutchman and the fish people, since At World's End? These look exactly like those. The entire teaser gives me a terrible dejavu of the Dead Man's Chest teaser.
Here's a hoping at least the soundtrack goes back to the thematic ones from the first three. Dead Man's Chest + At World's End are one of my favorite soundtracks.
That makes the first and second part of trilogies fillers, so i disagree. I take filler to mean something that doesnt really connect with the main story, something to fill the gap, like tv shows does. The second one was no filler. The 4th is the one im most tempted calling a filler because of its content, if anything.
I found 2 to be pretty average but didn't like 3 any more either :/ I didn't even know there was a forth one... or I just decided to skip it back in the day
I found 2 to be pretty average but didn't like 3 any more either :/ I didn't even know there was a forth one... or I just decided to skip it back in the day
You didn't miss much, it was the worst one yet by far. Not even Ian McShane could salvage it.
Oh Ian was in it? Anyway, I forgot to add that I found this trailer quite good, but mainly because Bardem seems to fit his role as good as the hair effects looked: very well
That makes the first and second part of trilogies fillers, so i disagree. I take filler to mean something that doesnt really connect with the main story, something to fill the gap, like tv shows does. The second one was no filler. The 4th is the one im most tempted calling a filler because of its content, if anything.
There is totally what it is. Maybe I he ment it felt like a filler.
First movie was pretty entertaining. Everything since then has been more or less redundant.
²
I had to restart watching the second movie several times because it was just more of the same but somehow less well executed. The first movie really was spot on in every way and it's like the second and third movies were made out of left-over ideas they jammed together into an entertaining but somehow superfluous sequel.
I once visited a museum about privateers and it claimed ship decks were painted red so the crew wouldn't get demoralized when they saw blood all over the place during a battle. I can't find anything on Google backing that up though.
sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Anyway, I forgot to add that I found this trailer quite good, but mainly because Bardem seems to fit his role as good as the hair effects looked: very well 
