VRAM 2GB vs 4GB
Page 3 of 4 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27317

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 13:49    Post subject:
Mchart wrote:
consolitis wrote:
Buying a 2GB card today.. not a good choice.


Can you present us with an objective benchmark @ 1080p resolution supporting this claim?


I'm not talking about the games already available.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Mchart




Posts: 7314

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 13:56    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
Mchart wrote:
consolitis wrote:
Buying a 2GB card today.. not a good choice.


Can you present us with an objective benchmark @ 1080p resolution supporting this claim?


I'm not talking about the games already available.


O RLY?
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27317

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 14:02    Post subject:


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 14:03    Post subject:
Wouldn't that technically mean that any card you buy with any amount of VRAM isn't a good choice since the probability of games in the future bottlenecking it might happen?

Cool Face


Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27317

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 14:07    Post subject:
Prefetian wrote:
Wouldn't that technically mean that any card you buy with any amount of VRAM isn't a good choice since the probability of games in the future bottlenecking it might happen?

Cool Face


No, it's improbable a 4GB card would be VRAM bottlenecked in the next x years, and impossible a 6GB one would.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 14:23    Post subject:
That's horseshit, as a 4GB Kepler card already *is* bottlenecked by the crippled bandwidth. It may have 4GB, but it's not going to be able to deal with it fast enough for it to be really useful.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27317

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 14:29    Post subject:
And I talked about a Kepler card where? All I said was:

consolitis wrote:
Buying a 2GB card today.. not a good choice.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10843
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 14:36    Post subject:
Anyway, i want to see a game this year that is pushing so mad textures that it will bring 2GB memory to the knees @ 1080p. Next year is whole different thing, then we get new GPUs anyway, better upgrade then.
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 15:53    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
And I talked about a Kepler card where? All I said was:

consolitis wrote:
Buying a 2GB card today.. not a good choice.

yes we are all fucking now without titans Laughing
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27317

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 16:10    Post subject:
It's myopic. If you are well aware you'll have to upgrade not that far in the future though, then it's ok.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 16:39    Post subject:
one buys hardware for todays standards, not for next year and not for tomorrow.
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23359
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 17:53    Post subject:
Paintface wrote:
one buys hardware for todays standards, not for next year and not for tomorrow.


Exactly!


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
human_steel




Posts: 33269

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 17:59    Post subject:
Paintface wrote:
one buys hardware for todays standards, not for next year and not for tomorrow.

Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10812
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 18:10    Post subject:
Paintface wrote:
one buys hardware for todays standards, not for next year and not for tomorrow.


I think a lot of people buying hardware now will be thinking about how well it will perform once next gen consoles and games are released, because it really isn't that far off.

This was a good read, some interesting replies.. http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1754176


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 18:37    Post subject:
I was thinking of possible games which would use 2GB VRAM fully, Skyrim came to mind. My modded Skyrim eats every MB of my 2GB VRAM. I'd personally play it safe and buy a 4GB edition, but I am someone who rarely upgrades.
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 35056
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 19:15    Post subject:
Between 2GB and 4GB I'd go for the 4GB version if the price difference isn't too big, games are starting to get rather close to 2 GB VRAM usage now, Bioshock Infinite for example.
(Then again the streaming system in that build of UE3 seems to be a bit more dynamic and will make use of more VRAM if available, much like with how Windows Vista and later caches system RAM.)

Unsure how much the actual screen resolution, anti-aliasing and anisotropic-filtering affects things but that's also something to consider.
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10812
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 19:29    Post subject:
It's about £70 price difference. I have my two GTX 460's on ebay at the moment, so that could be another 60-100 pounds. I saw an MSI GTX 460 sell for £71, but I'm not expecting to get that much. Got an old 8800 I can use once they are sold.


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Thu, 4th Apr 2013 20:34    Post subject:
JBeckman wrote:
Between 2GB and 4GB I'd go for the 4GB version if the price difference isn't too big, games are starting to get rather close to 2 GB VRAM usage now, Bioshock Infinite for example.
(Then again the streaming system in that build of UE3 seems to be a bit more dynamic and will make use of more VRAM if available, much like with how Windows Vista and later caches system RAM.)

Unsure how much the actual screen resolution, anti-aliasing and anisotropic-filtering affects things but that's also something to consider.

that's just what gpu monitoring apps report. doesn't mean all of that vram is actively in use. i have a 2gb card, after 30 minutes of bioshock all vram gets filled up (according to afterburner) but i don't have any slow downs. so far every single article investigating 4gb vs 2gb showed that 4gb is useless, even on huge resolutions and multiple displays.

price difference, well, for 4GB gtx670 you can get 2gb gtx680, which will rape 4gb 670 Laughing

i kinda feel bad for a people who buy 4gb gtx670/680 cards, but i guess that's what they deserve for being so gullible
Back to top
Stige




Posts: 3546
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon, 8th Apr 2013 07:43    Post subject:
Or just buy AMD and enjoy the performance WITH the "required" amount of memory for future use aswell?
Oh, and save some money on top of that aswell.
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10812
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu, 11th Apr 2013 14:13    Post subject:
Sold my GTX 460's on ebay for 72 quid each... But, one buyer was bidding on both cards and got out bided on one of them, so I am thinking maybe he wanted to SLI them. He hasn't paid yet. Neutral

Edit: Sold. Ordered a 2GB EVGA GTX 670 FTW to be delivered tomorrow.


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 03:06    Post subject:
Newty182 wrote:
Sold my GTX 460's on ebay for 72 quid each... But, one buyer was bidding on both cards and got out bided on one of them, so I am thinking maybe he wanted to SLI them. He hasn't paid yet. Neutral

Edit: Sold. Ordered a 2GB EVGA GTX 670 FTW to be delivered tomorrow.


dunno if 2GB is gonna be enough.... Troll Face
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10812
Location: UK
PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 07:51    Post subject:
Rage Rage Rage Rage Rage Rage

Laughing


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10843
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 10:03    Post subject:
I heard that next gen games will use approximately 4GB VRAM if you use atleast 800x600 resolution upscaled to 720p without AA.
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 10:19    Post subject:
fo sho
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 11:57    Post subject:
Imma favo this topic, let's converge next year back here Wink


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 12:21    Post subject:
good luck, next year this topic will be as irrelevant as 4GB vram on current gpus.
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 12:49    Post subject:
So a GPU is only 1 year good before it needs replacement? Laughing

In that case, say hello to my ancient dual HD6870, almost as good as your 670, yet mine are way older (since oct. 2010) , for even lower the price (€175 and €150) Laughing


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)


Last edited by sausje on Fri, 12th Apr 2013 12:57; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 12:57    Post subject:
sausje wrote:
So a GPU is only 1 year good before it needs replacement? Laughing

In that case, say hello to my ancient dual HD6870, still kicking the shit out of your shitty 670 in terms of horsepower, for even lower the price Laughing

yes in 1 year current gpus will be 2+ year old. anyone who likes to play latest games on a big screen and big res will have moved on to Maxwell and other offerings.
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 13:01    Post subject:
Not everyone can afford a new card every 1/2 years.
Plus your statement is still not valid, with exception from BioShock and C3, i run EVERY game at 1080p with 60 fps and maxed out graphics. (yet my cards are 2++ years old already)
By the time the new consoles hit and (hopefully) have positive impact on PC gaming aswell, my cards will be 3 years old and only then (if the above is the case) will they need replacement.
If by then only a handfull of games can't run maxed out, but the rest can, i don't see a point in upgrading.


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 12th Apr 2013 13:13    Post subject:
not sure why are you keep talking about your own cards, it's getting a bit offtopic. these 4gb cards are worthless. if you read some reviews you'll see that i'm not talking out of my ass. for example hardocp did extensive review of 4gb model, they put it through rigorous testing, multiple displays, sli, high resolution, most demanding games, all that jazz where theoretically high vram card should shine, yet 4gb cards showed pretty much 0 benefit over 2gb counterparts.
Back to top
Page 3 of 4 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group