| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Need to install a new Win XP version, but which one? |
Martin2
Replies: 19
Views: 1854
|
 Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Wed, 6th Feb 2008 23:44 Subject: Need to install a new Win XP version, but which one? |
If you want a release of 'Windows XP Pro. with SP2 VL', that has post-SP2 updates integrated and passes WGA with the supplied VLK, then the latest release is :
Windows.XP.Professional.Student.Editi ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Wed, 6th Feb 2008 23:00 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
LOL 
Yeah, i know what you mean, but if it was just the label, then it would be another story and wouldn't have taken so much of my time, but since the label here is one, in a series of clues, as ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 2nd Feb 2008 03:21 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Sorry, just wanted to add two correction :
1. There is actually something called a 'Student Version' of Windows(i'm not talking about the well-known academic version, which also isn't VL), but stil ... |
| Topic: How difficult is it to run a pirated windows XP? |
Martin2
Replies: 14
Views: 910
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 26th Jan 2008 16:36 Subject: How difficult is it to run a pirated windows XP? |
@snop1050
Sorry mate, i didn't meant to be disrespectfull towards you or anything, but i just feel that there are better ways available...
Let's look at it this way : In the last 3+ year's, then ... |
| Topic: How difficult is it to run a pirated windows XP? |
Martin2
Replies: 14
Views: 910
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 26th Jan 2008 03:42 Subject: How difficult is it to run a pirated windows XP? |
Personally, then i can't understand why anyone would go through the trouble of keeping those cracked dll's by eth0 updated all the time, when there is better ways to do it...
To avoid having to us ... |
| Topic: How difficult is it to run a pirated windows XP? |
Martin2
Replies: 14
Views: 910
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 26th Jan 2008 01:51 Subject: How difficult is it to run a pirated windows XP? |
As have allready been said, then you just need a volume licensed version of Windows XP Pro with SP2, and a non-blacklisted and MS-registered VLK.
If you don't want to update it by yourself and wan ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 12th Jan 2008 22:51 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Doh! Thank you very much for the correction, kosmiq
@All
I haden't actually downloaded the "student edition" releases from eth0 or PMM, as i allready had the official MSDN ISO : 'en_winxp_pro ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 12th Jan 2008 17:38 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Some background info :
The first "Student Edition" scene release of WinXP Pro. with SP2, was from PMM and again they have borrowed NoPe's XP source and VLK and the release was named :
Microsoft. ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 12th Jan 2008 04:15 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| ...Forgot to say that there actually exists an edition called 'Academic Edition', but that is a retail product and isn't the release which eth0 are releasing. Also, some people say that the "student e ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 12th Jan 2008 00:59 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| The group 'eth0', are releasing the official MSDN release with RyanVM's update pack integrated every month. They mention in there nfo's that the source iso and VLK are from the group 'NoPe' and that t ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Thu, 10th Jan 2008 02:34 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
For anybody wondering, then FTFiSO's release weren't a dupe, because PMM's VL release from the day before, had this in it's SPNOTES.HTM file :
"The Beta Version of Service Pack 2 [...]"
Anyway ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 16:25 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| For those who's wondering about why i'm interested in this, then it's because i want to know which releases comes from official MS sources and which is homemade(slipstreamed). Before i investigated th ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 6th Jan 2008 00:28 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| A release gets nuked if it's validating scene rules and which is what i'm talking about here(and not about if it's woking right or not)... And i do use nLite to slipstream all updates onto a WinXP-Pro ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 5th Jan 2008 21:03 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Haha, yes, it sure does, mate  Thanks for your reply, it's appreciated |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 5th Jan 2008 19:57 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
...Also notice that only FTFiSO's release features the two files 'SP1.cab' and 'SP1.cat'...
Anyway, if you are using one of ETH0's releases, which has RyanVM's post-sp2 update pack integrated, then ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 5th Jan 2008 03:21 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Here follows a WinDiff listing of the different/missing files between the extracted iso's of FTFiSO's release(x2pvol_en) and the MSDN release(vrmpvol_en) :
-- d:\temp\testing\vrmpvol_en : d:\temp\t ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 5th Jan 2008 02:33 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| After thinking about it, then i personally do not believe that FTFiSO's release is an official MS release, as MS does not "forget" to update the eula.txt file on a new release + also all the other stu ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Fri, 4th Jan 2008 14:39 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
In every Windows release there is a file named 'eula.txt' in the '.\I386' folder which on the last line states which exact version it is.
Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.Corporate.incl.SP2-FTFi ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Wed, 2nd Jan 2008 01:49 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| Okay, if anyone other than me should be interessted in this, then i have gotten my hands on the VRMPVOL_EN.iso version and compared it to the X2PVOL_EN.bin/cue from FTFiSO. They are both untouched VL ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Mon, 31st Dec 2007 01:10 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| Thanks kosmiq, but i'm 99.9% sure that PMM's release is a corporate release and not a retail release, since a) it dosen't need an actiavtion crack and b) it's listed in the nfo to only be protected b ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 30th Dec 2007 22:15 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
@kosmiq
I'm sorry about my previous reply to you and i apologize(i was in a bad mood at the time).
I know that the label dosen't matter, but things like these just interest me i.e. if there are ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 30th Dec 2007 17:52 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| It matters to me because i find it interessting! If it dosen't interest you, then please f*** off and stop polutting my thread with useless comments! |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 30th Dec 2007 16:21 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Thank's for your reply Yes, i know those labels as they match the list on tacktech.com.
Anyway, i have just found out that the CD that contains XP SP2 alone and which can be ordered from MS is l ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 30th Dec 2007 00:15 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
| Thank's for your reply, mate Yeahh, i know the label dosen't matter per say, but nonetheless, i am still interessted in it Btw, i have just searched some more and then i found someone saying in ... |
| Topic: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
Martin2
Replies: 29
Views: 4392
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 29th Dec 2007 23:25 Subject: Correct WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp label: X2PVOL_EN or VRMPVOL_EN ? |
The WinXP-Pro-SP2-Corp. release by FTFiSO :
Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.Corporate.incl.SP2-FTFiSO
Is labeled :
X2PVOL_EN
However, on http://www.tacktech.com/display.cfm?ttid=342 whe ... |
| Topic: WinXP.Pro.sp2.Corp-FTFiso: Has it been nuked in pre-channels |
Martin2
Replies: 7
Views: 515
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 17th Jun 2007 01:33 Subject: WinXP.Pro.sp2.Corp-FTFiso: Has it been nuked in pre-channels |
@LeoNatan
HAHA *LOL* sorry, mate - i guess that i'm a little to sensitive Thank you for clarifying what you meant, mate Yes, i know that ETH0 makes monthly release with RyanVM's update pack i ... |
| Topic: WinXP.Pro.sp2.Corp-FTFiso: Has it been nuked in pre-channels |
Martin2
Replies: 7
Views: 515
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sun, 17th Jun 2007 00:46 Subject: WinXP.Pro.sp2.Corp-FTFiso: Has it been nuked in pre-channels |
@LeoNatan
Would you please clarify what you mean with : "WTF?! XP SP2?! " If your point is that it's old, then you are quite right, but just because you happen to think that it's too old to still b ... |
| Topic: WinXP.Pro.sp2.Corp-FTFiso: Has it been nuked in pre-channels |
Martin2
Replies: 7
Views: 515
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Sat, 16th Jun 2007 19:58 Subject: WinXP.Pro.sp2.Corp-FTFiso: Has it been nuked in pre-channels |
| If someone has access to a pre-channel database, where you can search back in the archives to august 2004, then i would really appreciate if you could please check if FTFiso's WinXP Pro. SP2 Corp. rel ... |
| Topic: About PMM's WinXP-SP2 release(6.aug.'04) VS. FTFiso's(7aug). |
Martin2
Replies: 1
Views: 345
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Tue, 5th Jun 2007 22:37 Subject: About PMM's WinXP-SP2 release(6.aug.'04) VS. FTFiso's(7aug). |
OK, i just found a thread in the 'Applications' section where 'sphinxer' stated :
"the PMM release is fucked
the SPNOTES.HTM on the CD said "The Beta Version of
Service Pack 2 Integrated with
M ... |
| Topic: About PMM's WinXP-SP2 release(6.aug.'04) VS. FTFiso's(7aug). |
Martin2
Replies: 1
Views: 345
|
Forum: Operating Systems Posted: Mon, 4th Jun 2007 21:46 Subject: About PMM's WinXP-SP2 release(6.aug.'04) VS. FTFiso's(7aug). |
| Do any of you guys know if PMM's WinXP-Pro-SP2 release from the 6'th august 04 is a corporate version ? From reading the NFO, then it seems like a corp release, since there's no mention of an activati ... |
| |
