Nvidia accused of crippling board partners' designs
Page 1 of 1
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Oct 2012 05:52    Post subject: Nvidia accused of crippling board partners' designs
Quote:
Nvidia is claimed to be exerting pressure on its board partners to stick to stock voltages in their designs, forcing them to drop hardware or software overvolting and even restricting most other hardware modifications on boards based on the GK100 GPU.

Hints as to the problem came earlier this week, when Overclockers found a thread on the EVGA forums stating that Nvidia is enforcing 'guidelines' that have resulted in the removal of the EVBot port - used to adjust hardware settings including voltages - from the company's GeForce GTX 680 products.


Bit-Tech


Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34987
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Oct 2012 07:23    Post subject:
I thought it was just a warranty thing, well there's usually a bit more to it than what PR people announce or maybe that's just me.

http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=369337

And

http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=369326
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24643
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Oct 2012 08:53    Post subject:
Quote:
A day or two ago we reported that NVIDIA has halted EVGA to include EVBot support on their GeForce GTX 680 Classified graphics cards. Apparantly this is due to NVIDIA's Green Light program, which requires board partners to validate their designs with NVIDIA before making the final product. NVIDIA initially allowed the GeForce GTX 680 Classified because it would serve as a good marketing tool to set overclocking records, but forced EVGA to tune down the card once it had served its purpose.


If it is what it looks like, nVidia just pulled another stunt. They got the Classified cards reviewed with higher than the moon overclocks = mega-PR. When the important reviews were done, they nerfed it by removing warranty from cards that doesn't adhere to a new set of rules meant to avoid giving other people the same performance advantage that the reviewers had, while people will still buy the Classified version based on those reviews.

Winner? nVidia. They sell more GPU's based on temporarily sanctioned overvolting capabilities.


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Oct 2012 12:50    Post subject:
Wouldn't that be misinformation, thus illegal?
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24643
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Oct 2012 13:06    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
Wouldn't that be misinformation, thus illegal?


Since when did that stop any corporation? They just go into multiyear lawsuits that are later settled out of court.


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group