R600
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
polosistealth




Posts: 3447

PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 19:08    Post subject: R600
a monkey with a bunch of R600's in his lap. PRICELESS Laughing


Intel i7 14700K | Gainward RTX4090 Phantom GS 24GB | 32GB DDR5 Corsair Vengeance RGB 6000mhz | SSD nvme Samsung 970EVO 500GB | SSD 2TB Sandisk Ultra 3D | SSD 2TB NVME Crucial P5 Plus |
Creative Sound BlasterX G6 | Fractal Meshify 2 XL | Logitech G703 | Corsair RM850x White | HyperX Cloud | DELL S2721DGF 27" 165hz Gsync + Sony 55XH9077 4K @ 120hz + VRR
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 20:11    Post subject:
my next videocard Smile , cant wait for the first real benches with the right drivers , and to see what price it will go for , AMD ATI said around 400 US dollars , saw on a german site they are selling it for 360 euros , and if its really faster then a 8800GTX .... then thats good news .
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 20:44    Post subject:
It isnt faster then a 8800GTX...

http://www.dailytech.com/ATI+Radeon+HD+2900+XTX+Doomed+from+the+Start/article7052.htm

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=703&Itemid=34

Quote:
ATI said in front of 150+ journalists that the R600XT won't be able to compete with the Geforce 8800 GTX. The dream is dead and Radeon HD 2900 XT won't be able to catch up with the six month old Geforce 8800 GTX.

ATI said that R600XT, Radeon HD 2900XT has about the same performance as the 8800 GTS. Radeon HD 2900 XTX won't be launched in mid may and will be delayed to Q3 2007. We already wrote about this here.

The dream that AMD can do something and return as the high end market leader is gone. R600 trails against G80. Congratulations Nvidia.


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
upstart_69




Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 21:05    Post subject:
Disappointing. I mean its nice to still have the fastest card on the market(besides the insanely priced factory overclocked one). But I feel bad for the big red company from canada who used to make kickass cards. And for the chipmaker who came out with the cool codenamed processors like 'shark' and 'sledgehammer.' Now they are like one big company that can't do anything right.

Sure DAMMIT can come out next round with something that blows competition out of the water. But it's really damn hard to picture it, when the biggest splash they can make right now is competing with the competition's second-place card monthes later.


Core i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz | 6GB OCZ DDR3 8-8-8-24 @ 1600mhz | eVga x58 Mobo | 2 x eVga GTX 460 SLI | Intel X25-M + 3x Seagate + WD Black = 2.75TB | X-Fi Titanium | PCP&C Silencer 750 | G15 KB | G5 Mouse | G35 Headset | Z-5500 Digital | Samsung T260HD
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 21:06    Post subject:
Here's a spoiler for you: they won't.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
Kamikaze666




Posts: 3550

PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 22:07    Post subject:
just release the r600 now with beta drivers, nvidia did it too!!


Quote:
PC awesome button = Uninstall!
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 22:33    Post subject:
but yea i guess we will see next week how it will perform with hopefully new non beta drivers .
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 22:52    Post subject:
is that waldos brother Razz
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 23:23    Post subject:
ELIZ wrote:
is that waldos brother Razz

Waldo isn't a monkey...
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Sun, 13th May 2007 23:53    Post subject:
Tweaktown has released the official review today but their servers got hammered so badly that they took it down until tomorrow.
Back to top
velum




Posts: 1106

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 06:55    Post subject:
http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4946&s=1


Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one
Back to top
Mutantius
VIP Member



Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 07:17    Post subject:
Stefan F wrote:
but yea i guess we will see next week how it will perform with hopefully new non beta drivers .


Dude, Im quite sure not a single tweaked driver will make it any better then the G80s flagship... Also take note on the official ATI/AMD statement.


"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
Back to top
KrAzY-KaMeL




Posts: 2248
Location: City Of Compton
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 10:59    Post subject:
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTM0MSwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

^That's the only review you guys should give a rats ass about.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 11:08    Post subject:
The 2900 is a POS Razz


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 11:30    Post subject:
8800 gtx beats what ati had cooking? holy shit ive never been happier with me decision to flip ati off with their stupid ass delays and grab my 8800!

you guys just made my day if this is true Very Happy


Back to top
$en$i
VIP Member



Posts: 3127

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 13:23    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
8800 gtx beats what ati had cooking?

hardocp.com wrote:
The facts are though that it doesnโ€™t even match the 8800 GTS currently.
Back to top
kosmiq




Posts: 2304
Location: Somewhere
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 13:52    Post subject:
Now I feel happy I bought my 8800GTS instead of waiting for the R600..



Behold his GLORY! Bow for the technical master!
Back to top
$en$i
VIP Member



Posts: 3127

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 14:04    Post subject:
kosmiq wrote:
Now I feel happy I bought my 8800GTS instead of waiting for the R600..
Well the R600 release may still push nvidia to lower its prices.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 14:11    Post subject:
I don't think so Razz


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
$en$i
VIP Member



Posts: 3127

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 14:33    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
I don't think so Razz
Let me dream for now. Wink
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73220
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:12    Post subject:
Lol, where are all those that said AMD would dwarf anything nVidia has out in the market... I can't say how overjoyed I am for not waiting for this crap!
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:25    Post subject:
/shrug i hoped for more , its same price as the GTS and is faster/slower depending on game benchmark , so they didnt fail , but i hoped it would be closer to the GTX performance , but i guess we have to wait for the XTX to compare those .

hopefully those drivers will mature fast , cause the card has great potential .

We got a few months to go till the first full blown DX10 games are out and then the majority will look for DX cards , will be interesting how good the mainstream cards perform against eachother also .
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:25    Post subject:
Man, AMD is killing themselves with this lmao. First they fuck up the AM2 socket now this.


Back to top
cnZ
Banned



Posts: 3091

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:28    Post subject:
guys, 2900xt drivers are broken atm.

so far 2900xt is the fastest gaming gpu on planet in resolutions over 1920x**** with AA & AF enabled:d

so it seems drivers aren't allowing the gpu to take maximum out somewhy at lower resolutions.

besides, there are already bunch of reviews out, but they are 50/50 - in some tests it's slower than 8800gts and in some tests it's even faster than 8800ultra.

for example, this one:
http://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/radeon_hd_2900_xt/



and for example this site says 2900xt got 0 points in 3dmark06:
http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/407-9/ATI+Radeon+HD+2900+XT+512MB/

:d

in this site's 3dmark06 test 2900xt was faster than 8800gts but slower than gtx:
http://www.hartware.de/review_707_5.html

--

everyone know the drivers are broken for 2900xt at the moment and its full potential isn't used yet. well, it should be logical, because it's 512bit instead of 8800gts/gtx/ultra 384 (not referring to memory) and has 740/825 clocks. also it's on 80nm - it should have a nice overclocking potential.

wait for final drivers


yes
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:34    Post subject:
yup , 8800 drivers had 6 months to mature , granted they did manage to bring the card out earlier .

2900xt/xtx or the respin will be my new card in august/september , so i hope till then everything will be ironed out .

About ppl screaming ATI getting owned i am not so worried , since the 9700 pro nvidia never had a faster GPU in the same generation and many still bought nvidia .
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:38    Post subject:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTM0MSwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

^That's the only review you guys should give a rats ass about.


Why in gods name did they use WoW as a test game? It looks like shit and a 3 year old system could run it. They should have used FEAR and/or Quake 4


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73220
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:44    Post subject:
SpykeZ wrote:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTM0MSwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

^That's the only review you guys should give a rats ass about.


Why in gods name did they use WoW as a test game? It looks like shit and a 3 year old system could run it. They should have used FEAR and/or Quake 4

Rolling Eyes Lol, dumb users want their dumb games tested as well... Laughing
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:47    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
SpykeZ wrote:
KrAzY-KaMeL wrote:
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTM0MSwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

^That's the only review you guys should give a rats ass about.


Why in gods name did they use WoW as a test game? It looks like shit and a 3 year old system could run it. They should have used FEAR and/or Quake 4

Rolling Eyes Lol, dumb users want their dumb games tested as well... Laughing


Laughing Laughing Wonder how much they paid Razz I mean a test showing over 100FPS....just plain and simple tells you you don't need these cards to run the game and makes the test irrelevant.


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73220
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 22:56    Post subject:
And, didn't AMD push the release of R600 to be able to create the ultimate drivers? Laughing If nVidia is winning with the crappy, (admittedly) unoptimized DX10 drivers, I wonder what will happen when they start optimizing them... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Mon, 14th May 2007 23:02    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
And, didn't AMD push the release of R600 to be able to create the ultimate drivers? Laughing If nVidia is winning with the crappy, (admittedly) unoptimized DX10 drivers, I wonder what will happen when they start optimizing them... Rolling Eyes


lmao touche' I'm sticking with my 7900GS KO for awile still. Mabye I'll get the R600 at some point Laughing


Back to top
Page 1 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group