| Page 18 of 19 |
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
 Posted: Thu, 18th Aug 2005 10:50 Post subject: |
|
 |
n order to get the best game play experience, it is not recommended to
run F.E.A.R. at high resolutions. You should avoid resolutions above
1024x768 on any current generation card.
So i would say hes full of it if he think 1600x1200 is playable.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Aug 2005 14:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Ignore me  .... played part of the demo up to now and thought that it rocked... think I need a new pc though, its not running so quick on my ageing XP1800+ :/ lol
Last edited by budgie55 on Thu, 18th Aug 2005 14:36; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Aug 2005 15:40 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Aug 2005 16:16 Post subject: |
|
|
it works skid... like i said just keep posting and it'll sort itself out until it gets to the end of page 14 and it'll happen again.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 18th Aug 2005 17:43 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't like Carmacks opinion on the role of physics games. He says referring to the aegaia ppu unit) he'd rather prefer to see PC components that allow developers to create even more realistic graphics, he says physics aren't so important for gameplay, they don't really add that much to the experience  . He still can't create the photorealistic graphics he'd like.
Well thats his opinion, but imho its quite wrong. We've only seen the tip of the iceberg when it comes to physics, imagine te gameplay possibilities with completely physically interactive environments that allow true physical dynamic destruction and realistic water behaviour etc. Don't tell me thats nothing new for gameplay.
And he's acting rather unfair towards other young development studios. Sure, id is big and has money, no wonder they have the time and capital to be able to develop photorealistic graphics (thats one hell of artwork to achieve that, getting so much detail in models and textures thats its photorealistic), but smaller developement studios simply don't have the capital and personell for that, a thing like the ppu is there chance to develop something special, since it allows new technological abilities in PC gaming.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon999
Posts: 169
Location: Lithuania
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 12:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| FakeBitchKillah.inc wrote: | i changed from the official nvidia drivers to 80.40 and i got a lot of frames more now !°!°!°
i can easy play 1024 x768 everything on maximum 16 af 4 aa
no slowdowns
 |
@Kamikaze666
is this normal that its on the head some kind of stud?
@FakeBitchKillah.inc
do u think that beter to use 80.40 drivers instead of 77.72? wont it damage system i mean 80.40 drivers?
| FakeBitchKillah.inc wrote: | i changed from the official nvidia drivers to 80.40 and i got a lot of frames more now !°!°!°
i can easy play 1024 x768 everything on maximum 16 af 4 aa
no slowdowns
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 12:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| Moon999 wrote: | | FakeBitchKillah.inc wrote: | i changed from the official nvidia drivers to 80.40 and i got a lot of frames more now !°!°!°
i can easy play 1024 x768 everything on maximum 16 af 4 aa
no slowdowns
|
@Kamikaze666
is this normal that its on the head some kind of stud?
@FakeBitchKillah.inc
do u think that beter to use 80.40 drivers instead of 77.72? wont it damage system i mean 80.40 drivers?
| FakeBitchKillah.inc wrote: | i changed from the official nvidia drivers to 80.40 and i got a lot of frames more now !°!°!°
i can easy play 1024 x768 everything on maximum 16 af 4 aa
no slowdowns
|
|
they are beta drivers so its your own risk !!
but i dont think they can damage something !!
4 me they worked fine !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon999
Posts: 169
Location: Lithuania
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 15:37 Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for an answer  tested witg fraps i got 40 FPS almost all on high, sometimes stucks, maybe ram is not enough
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 15:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| Moon999 wrote: | | thanks for an answer tested witg fraps i got 40 FPS almost all on high, sometimes stucks, maybe ram is not enough |
i got 1 gig ram too !!
its enough if u have fast quality ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 16:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moon999
Posts: 169
Location: Lithuania
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 18:04 Post subject: |
|
|
i think 40fps is okay i am using Trancened RAM 2x256 and 1x512 so total 1gb, specifications 400MHZ PC3200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 21:24 Post subject: |
|
|
it runs great on mine too at 1024x768
gforce 6600 256 mb
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 21:29 Post subject: |
|
|
WHERE THIS GAME DOWNLOAD PLZ PLZ I WANT THIS GAME BAD THX
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| radge wrote: | | WHERE THIS GAME DOWNLOAD PLZ PLZ I WANT THIS GAME BAD THX |
eat shit
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 24th Aug 2005 21:49 Post subject: |
|
|
yea.... october i.e. 2 months geez man what about stalker? Its already 5 months late yet im still waiting  I think you'll find FEAR being released in october is quite early considering the plans at the start of the year it never realistically was gonna make a june/july release date.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 25th Aug 2005 03:13 Post subject: |
|
|
F.E.A.R. First Encounter Assault Recon FEAR-DEViANCE 5CD's - NUKED reason: fake !!
You wanted a Miracle, I give you the F. B. Eye !!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Thu, 25th Aug 2005 19:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that was a largely dissapointing demo...
Ah, well... as expected I suppose.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 25th Aug 2005 19:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| dextertech wrote: | | radge wrote: | | WHERE THIS GAME DOWNLOAD PLZ PLZ I WANT THIS GAME BAD THX |
eat shit |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
| Posted: Thu, 25th Aug 2005 21:56 Post subject: |
|
|
heh @ Animal Mother.
Thought the demo was ok and delivered what we can expect in the retail.
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 08:25 Post subject: |
|
|
What is it with these damn game-developers and filling every room with enemy soldiers? That does not (in my mind) convey fear, it conveys frustration.
Fear is about suspension, and the unexpected.
"Ooo! Corridor goes black all of a sudden", well ... since this has been used, re-used, recycled, recycled again ... this isn't unexpected at all.
Also... little children that laugh and leave footsteps (ie. in the ceiling) are scary? Since when? It wasn't scary in "The Ring", "Dark Waters", "The Eye", and it isn't scary now either.
I expected that a game would be less about shooting at everything that moves, and more about story/suspension/immersion... I think Deus Ex managed to do this, without clogging every room with someone (or some thing) that wants to be shot dead [since computer A.I and realism, really can't create a believable enemy as of yet].
But if your expectations are the standard "Hollywood scary movie, with flashy effects and action", I'm sure you'll get just what you expected.
Plot twists? Haha... I can almost guess them already... in the end, you'll probably realize you're supernatural, and the FEAR-team will be after you instead.
edit: Either my expectations are too high, or everyone elses are too low ... no matter the case, my point still stands, my expectations weren't met.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 13:06 Post subject: |
|
|
| fisk wrote: | What is it with these damn game-developers and filling every room with enemy soldiers? That does not (in my mind) convey fear, it conveys frustration.
Fear is about suspension, and the unexpected.
"Ooo! Corridor goes black all of a sudden", well ... since this has been used, re-used, recycled, recycled again ... this isn't unexpected at all.
Also... little children that laugh and leave footsteps (ie. in the ceiling) are scary? Since when? It wasn't scary in "The Ring", "Dark Waters", "The Eye", and it isn't scary now either.
I expected that a game would be less about shooting at everything that moves, and more about story/suspension/immersion... I think Deus Ex managed to do this, without clogging every room with someone (or some thing) that wants to be shot dead [since computer A.I and realism, really can't create a believable enemy as of yet].
But if your expectations are the standard "Hollywood scary movie, with flashy effects and action", I'm sure you'll get just what you expected.
Plot twists? Haha... I can almost guess them already... in the end, you'll probably realize you're supernatural, and the FEAR-team will be after you instead.
edit: Either my expectations are too high, or everyone elses are too low ... no matter the case, my point still stands, my expectations weren't met. |
1. Every one has a different sense of fear... The demo scareed the hell out of me...
2. Deus ex wasn't an action game... It was adventure/action/rpg... and it wasn't scary at alll
3. Abou the plot twists... I don't reallyt care if the game is fun... I you want a great story with twists play some adventure game... Although even they are quite easy to guess...
4. It's hard to invent something tha has been already invented... It harder to make a really unique game now, cause it's no like the game market is two years old...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 13:22 Post subject: |
|
|
btw at wich cards the game plays best nVIDIA or ATI?
I know my english is bad so correct me if i wrong.
thanks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 26th Aug 2005 14:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| 666Lestat666 wrote: | | btw at wich cards the game plays best nVIDIA or ATI? |
its an ati game but it runs good on my nvidia........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 18 of 19 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
with everything full except that.. so NER..
