| Page 16 of 42 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65088
Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 09:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Looks pretty cool but not my style 
Currently leak testing my PC at the moment!!
Pics coming tomorrow, IF there is no leak 
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rofl_Mao
Posts: 3187
Location: Nederland
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 11:19 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 11:35 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:36; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 14:40 Post subject: |
|
|
Nice, like that... Id nail my shit to a fridge wall without the plastic flashing on the fridge, big ass fan infront bolted over top drawing the cold through the fridge wall onto the mounting plate of the components... Wonder how much temp drop that would give..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 15:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| Perry Rhodan wrote: | hm i'd be worried about that PCIe extension introducing lag because of the longer datalines. Also it's probably not exactly a quiet setup  |
Think I went through this before about the Pci conenction, just make it a hard tracked connection I dont see any latency issues with moving the card away a bit from the pci slot, its either passing data direct or its not, there is no other hardware anyway between the two to cause any issues I would of thought... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 18:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Well i remember way back when mobos had something called "pipelined burst chache" and the specs from Intel said the datalines on the motherboard from the cache ram to the cpu socket couldn't be longer than 110mm (i think) otherwise it would screw up the cache ram timings. Now if you take the bus frequencies of a modern day graphicscard into account, a few nanoseconds will make a difference, so i don't think a extension like that is a good idea for a gaming card.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 19:06 Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm I can see this used in some smaller lab for computing purposes...
"Quantum mechanics is actually, contrary to it's reputation, unbeliveably simple, once you take the physics out."
Scott Aaronson | chiv wrote: | | thats true you know. newton didnt discover gravity. the apple told him about it, and then he killed it. the core was never found. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rofl_Mao
Posts: 3187
Location: Nederland
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 19:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| iconized wrote: | Speed of the signal in copper wire is approximately 2/3 the speed of light, I assume the wire is circa 15 cm long so extra latency is ≈ 7,5 nanoseconds. Since the GPU has its own memory I doubt it is a serious problem.
Edit: Somone posted this one in the "Hardware Zone" some time ago:
 |
Hmm, that looks very complicated. I guess I'll settle for this
| Lopin18 wrote: | | I think you played too much Fallout 3, Pedo Perk acquired. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Nov 2010 19:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Yep...
Macintosh, simple computers for simple people.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 15th Nov 2010 02:59 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | wait for new water cooling setup, not all lost yet  |
Passed all leak testing. Everything is running perrfectly. Fuck yea!
Leak testing:
And here is my finished product! (I was a little camera happy)
Bitspower compression fittings are amazing:
Thermochill PA 120.3 radiator:
EK Supreme HF full nickel (nickel plated):
I used a bit of clear tubing because I hate not being able to see whether the water is getting pumped or not. I need to see the pumping!
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ
Last edited by timechange01 on Tue, 16th Nov 2010 03:42; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24645
Location: Your Mom
|
| Posted: Mon, 15th Nov 2010 23:25 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Nov 2010 20:25 Post subject: |
|
|
You'd be surprised how crap the H50 isn't. For the price it does an amazing job.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Nov 2010 22:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| swingman wrote: | | inability to mount the rad outside. Unless you're willing to go all Wolverine on your computer's ass like tc did. |
Lol I was just about to say do what I did
Overall I liked the H50. I used it for almost a year and I was able to OC a phenom965 to 4.02Ghz fully stable which is a pretty nice OC in my opinion. I was also able to OC my i7 930 to 4.0Ghz. But now its time to go past 4.0
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Nov 2010 22:46 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 16th Nov 2010 23:35 Post subject: |
|
|
| swingman wrote: | | And you'd be surprised at how many air coolers there are that are as good or better than the H50. The biggest problem I would have with the H50 or any other pre-sealed kit is the inability to mount the rad outside. Unless you're willing to go all Wolverine on your computer's ass like tc did. |
ya but I like knowing that there isn't a massive weight load on my motherboard from a hunk of metal, and any heat my cpu does put off is generally going directly out of the case, not blowing into the case itself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24645
Location: Your Mom
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 00:11 Post subject: |
|
|
Is there an appreciative difference in performance between H50 and H70?
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 00:55 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 08:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| Breezer_ wrote: | | timechange01 wrote: | | swingman wrote: | | inability to mount the rad outside. Unless you're willing to go all Wolverine on your computer's ass like tc did. |
Lol I was just about to say do what I did
Overall I liked the H50. I used it for almost a year and I was able to OC a phenom965 to 4.02Ghz fully stable which is a pretty nice OC in my opinion. I was also able to OC my i7 930 to 4.0Ghz. But now its time to go past 4.0 |
Watercooling itself doesnt make you go past 4.0ghz, there is shitloads of things what you need to tweak after certain point :> |
True but water cooling eliminates a HUGE barrier between reaching higher clocks. Just overclocked my cpu to 4.4Ghz
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 08:44 Post subject: |
|
|
what are you using to check stability? I'd use intel burn test on "high" about 20 passes to get an idea if it's stable or not. Prime95 is garbage unless you just want to heat your cpu up and test memory/northbridge OC.
Prime95 doesn't have an optimized code for testing a CPU, IE you can send something like 1+1 infinite time to a cpu and it'll be under full load. It's why you can use your computer still with no lag. The intel burn test was developed with an optimized code made to stress the cpu under full load.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 08:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| SpykeZ wrote: | what are you using to check stability? I'd use intel burn test on "high" about 20 passes to get an idea if it's stable or not. Prime95 is garbage unless you just want to heat your cpu up and test memory/northbridge OC.
Prime95 doesn't have an optimized code for testing a CPU, IE you can send something like 1+1 infinite time to a cpu and it'll be under full load. It's why you can use your computer still with no lag. The intel burn test was developed with an optimized code made to stress the cpu under full load. |
I use IntelBurn like you told me. I never use Prime95 anymore. I did 10 passes on standard but I accept your challenge for 20 passes on high!
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 09:10 Post subject: |
|
|
high is what's recommended. I've plenty of OC's pass standard with whatever i had. It doesn't stress it enough. If it passes 20 high, then you're good. If you're curious, go ahead and do 30-40
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 17th Nov 2010 09:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| SpykeZ wrote: | | high is what's recommended. I've plenty of OC's pass standard with whatever i had. It doesn't stress it enough. If it passes 20 high, then you're good. If you're curious, go ahead and do 30-40 |
Just did 20 passes on high: http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=63556&start=60
I usually just stick to 10 passes on standard because its much faster
ASUS Maximus XII Formula | Core i9 10900k @ 5.2Ghz | 32GB G.Skill DDR4 4200Mhz | EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper | ASUS ROG PG35VQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 16 of 42 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
