Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak
Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Prandur




Posts: 2685

PostPosted: Sun, 20th Dec 2015 01:49    Post subject:
I just want a game with similar gameplay mechanics/elements as homeworld. To me that means an RTS without basebuilding (the mothership/base is mobile and moves with you), with a focus on tactics and correct army composition, and very slight rpg elements.
Back to top
Mercostol




Posts: 132

PostPosted: Sun, 20th Dec 2015 22:29    Post subject:
as long as it's not another c&c 4
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Fri, 8th Jan 2016 19:46    Post subject:
Back to top
Prandur




Posts: 2685

PostPosted: Fri, 8th Jan 2016 22:57    Post subject:
Somehow I'm more hyped for this than for Dragon's Dogma... really hope it's good. Pity I'm currently so swarmed in teaching that I'll probably not be able to touch it until end of January :\
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Fri, 8th Jan 2016 23:27    Post subject:
I never really played the other Homeworld games, as i don't like space strategy games.
A few weeks ago i stumbled upon this here, and it really looks promising. I guess many fans of the old games are disappointed in it though.
Let's see how it turns out.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
Hellifant




Posts: 2008
Location: getMoreMoney
PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jan 2016 17:27    Post subject:
am i the only one thinking its rather fishy that there is almost next to none gameplay footage (except VERY few scenes in the trailer) ? And it comes out in 12 days for 45 bucks. I wanna see some ingame shit, and not just a few seconds of it.


Last edited by Hellifant on Sat, 9th Jan 2016 19:58; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Vryder




Posts: 846

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jan 2016 18:29    Post subject:
Just the fact that the game runs on the Unity engine makes me skeptical. Neutral
Back to top
r3dshift




Posts: 2836

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jan 2016 19:12    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
am i the only one thinking its rather fishy that there is almost next to none gameplay fottage (except VERY few scenes in the trailer) ? And it comes out in 12 days for 45 bucks. I wanna see some ingame shit, and not just a few seconds of it.

Yep, the same thought occurred to me as well.


Frant wrote:
Shitass games are ruining piracy.
Back to top
pxxxxg




Posts: 176

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jan 2016 19:32    Post subject:
r3dshift wrote:
Hellifant wrote:
am i the only one thinking its rather fishy that there is almost next to none gameplay fottage (except VERY few scenes in the trailer) ? And it comes out in 12 days for 45 bucks. I wanna see some ingame shit, and not just a few seconds of it.

Yep, the same thought occurred to me as well.


That is why i am certain this will be a shitty game Sad
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65133
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jan 2016 00:26    Post subject:
pxxxxg wrote:
r3dshift wrote:
Hellifant wrote:
am i the only one thinking its rather fishy that there is almost next to none gameplay fottage (except VERY few scenes in the trailer) ? And it comes out in 12 days for 45 bucks. I wanna see some ingame shit, and not just a few seconds of it.

Yep, the same thought occurred to me as well.


That is why i am certain this will be a shitty game Sad

Hehe, it is quite suspicious indeed. Not even a preview, everything is "hush-hush'd" and Gearbox'd. It even gets 'fishier' when you remember the fact that this game was originally intended as a free-to-play multiplayer title (Hardware: Shipbreakers), usually a reason for concern. The isodemo will tell us the truth, it's the only way really. Razz
Back to top
Nodrim




Posts: 9710
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jan 2016 00:49    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
am i the only one thinking its rather fishy that there is almost next to none gameplay footage (except VERY few scenes in the trailer) ? And it comes out in 12 days for 45 bucks. I wanna see some ingame shit, and not just a few seconds of it.


It's funny that they give us a story video to a game that we have little idea on how it plays just 10 days before launch.
Back to top
Vryder




Posts: 846

PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 20:01    Post subject:
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 20:16    Post subject:
Youtube (IGN videos didn't load the picture):



Well, after skipping through it i must say, it didn't make me interested in the game at all. Looks rather bland overall.
Will still try the isodemo to judge it by myself.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
dethy




Posts: 3169
Location: Conclave of Shadows
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 21:03    Post subject:
ISOdemo it is then...


My specs:
Ryzen 5950x @ boosting 5ghz, Gigabyte x570 Aorus Master, 128gb G.Skill Trident Neo pc3600 ram, nVidia RTX 5080, SoundBlasterX G6, Samsung 980 Pro m.2 1TB and Hynix m.2 1TB storage SSD. Custom watercooling loop.

Derpsole: Nintendo Switch, Derpstation 5 Pro
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 22:37    Post subject:
I posted the videos in the Steamforums: (look at the last posts)
http://steamcommunity.com/app/281610/discussions/0/451850468364837811/?tscn=1452713434

I wrote that the gameplay looked boring. Then some nerds come out and tell me i have no taste and no long attention span, because i own so many games on Steam. Laughing Laughing Laughing

Steam forums... Steam forums never change.
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 23:10    Post subject:
well the first part of the video is about nothing, gets better in the next part, but i guess i will need to test on my own Wink


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
Wubbajack




Posts: 769
Location: Polandball's right eye
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 23:23    Post subject:
prudislav wrote:
well the first part of the video is about nothing

Were you expecting some huge plot twists in a TUTORIAL?
Of course it's boring, so was the tutorial in Homeworld 1. When it ended though... J Browman
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 23:31    Post subject:
yeah i know thats why talked about part 2 of the video which looks much more interesting unlike bob who watched only part 1 and went to troll steam-forums


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jan 2016 23:54    Post subject:
I watched a bit of the second video now, and the game still didn't give a "damn, nice!" emotion. In fact i felt nothing, and i normally get excited for RTS games.
Though i never liked the other Homeworld games, so maybe that is a reason.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
StrEagle




Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Jan 2016 01:23    Post subject:
I like it


Lutzifer wrote:
and yes, mine is only average
Back to top
sunseeker




Posts: 435

PostPosted: Thu, 14th Jan 2016 17:27    Post subject:
I like it too. It's basically Homeworld 2 on ground. Also the team is back and that's totally visible. It might not have 3d but for me it didn't have that much of an impact in previous games. It was darn difficult to control everything in all axis', so you ended up not using much of that verticality.

I love the effect terrain and sand dunes have on combat. I have high hopes.


7800x3D, 32GB DDR5 6000MHz, RTX 5070
Back to top
StrEagle




Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 00:03    Post subject:
soo 2 days, only on steam?


Lutzifer wrote:
and yes, mine is only average
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14857

PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 13:41    Post subject: *****
*****


Last edited by Areius on Fri, 19th Sep 2025 16:22; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Pey




Posts: 5601
Location: Argentina
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 13:59    Post subject:
I played the five first mission so far and I like it, reminds a lot to Ground Control, with a base. Graphics are definitely the weak point (textures are very low res), but gameplay-wise is pretty good (the zoom-out/zoom-in unit selection mechanic is very handy), music is amazing and the narrative is spot on. I shall post some screenies when the embargo ends.


Seasonic 1000w Planitum - TT Level 10 GT - ASUS M5E - i7 2600k @ 5.0ghz - 16GB Patriot Viper 3 - Dell u3011 - EVGA GTX 980 @ SLI - SSD Samsung EVO 250GB - 16TB W.D. - G19/G13 @ Roccat Kone XTD - Razer Vespula - Xonar Phoebus @ Vulcan ANC/Corsair 2100 Vengeance - Logitech G51
Back to top
qqq




Posts: 1518

PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 14:08    Post subject:
Pey wrote:
I played the five first mission so far and I like it, reminds a lot to Ground Control, with a base. Graphics are definitely the weak point (textures are very low res), but gameplay-wise is pretty good (the zoom-out/zoom-in unit selection mechanic is very handy), music is amazing and the narrative is spot on. I shall post some screenies when the embargo ends.



The devs said 10-12 hours if you're not on easy, for the campaign. How does it look so far?
Back to top
AnarchoS




Posts: 2142
Location: An Archos
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 14:25    Post subject:
Vryder wrote:
Just the fact that the game runs on the Unity engine makes me skeptical. Neutral


Why?
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 15:05    Post subject:
AnarchoS wrote:
Vryder wrote:
Just the fact that the game runs on the Unity engine makes me skeptical. Neutral


Why?

Often unstable or overall crappy performance with that engine.



qqq wrote:
The devs said 10-12 hours if you're not on easy, for the campaign. How does it look so far?

12 hours for the campaign only and i guess there only is one campaign? Wow. If that is true, i know where the devs didn't put much effort into in the last years: the textures and content.
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14857

PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 15:09    Post subject: *****
*****


Last edited by Areius on Fri, 19th Sep 2025 16:22; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31973
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 15:40    Post subject:
Yea textures look good most of the time.

But the second screenshot of yours is a good example of the bad looking graphics.
The carrier textures look of pretty low quality. Also Anistropic Filtering doesn't seem to work on that object.

I really don't get warm with this game. Two more days, then i judge it for myself.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
farne




Posts: 3741

PostPosted: Mon, 18th Jan 2016 16:31    Post subject:
Heh, they'd really strike gold if there was an option to "commandeer" an unit... would love another BattleZone like game.
Back to top
Page 2 of 4 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group