I've got my 5090 secured so it's time to move away from my Dell 1440P ASA
I have made the tough decision not to get an OLED though. At this point in my life I will be working on the screen for around 45-50 hours a week, and probably only gaming 7 hours a week at best.
SAMSUNG Odyssey Neo G8 4K Ultra HD 32 seems like a pretty decent non OLED monitor, has anyone got any thoughts on this or can suggest anything better?
In fairness I don't really want a curved screen, and 27" might have been better but oh well.
It likely will end up being completely pointless but I bought into the DP 2.1 noise that people are making and wanted to make sure I had that to go with the 5090.
Supposedly it has lesser chance of burn in also, and for monitors that you somehow have to try to be negligent towards to have burnins it's probably gonna last a good damn while
I guess it depends also on if you keep pushing the pixel refresh reminder away all day. As always i bet it often comes at the most inapropriate timining
I'm in the market for a new monitor either 27 or 31.5 inch. 1140p or 2160p for 400 to 600. Primarily for gaming of course but also for daily normal use. I was thinking about the oled Interactive mentioned above but I'm absolutely terrified of burn in. My PC is on all day basically and often just sitting at desktop so the burn in scares me.
Any suggestions for a good IPS at this price range or maybe reasurances on my fears of the OLED?
Have used nearly 3 years Samsung G8 OLED in heavy desktop usage, playing also games that have worst UI elements ever for OLED (D4, WoW etc..), no sign of burn in, panel is still perfect. Used C2 also long, did not get any burn in, my old C1 TV also does not have burn in.
Been looking for a new monitor coz my Benq 24" 120hz 1080p TN is showing worse brush marks on the panel and i'm tired of seeing them
I've been looking on those black friday deals from Youtubers but either they're out of reach, the brand is suspicious quality (KTC, TITAN ARMY, etc) or it has specs that doesn't matches my needs
Had my eyes for a MSI 4K/1080p dual setup for a long time but then i forgot 1080p would look horrible and 4K asks for a powerful PC to run stuff on it, with no 1440p middle ground option to choose... And also it has something new to my dictionary: "Vignetting" (Dark areas on the borders.. Total no. Give me a total coverage)
I've looked for a few budget monitors like my Benq but having:
-Fast IPS
-Minimal overshoot/strobing etc (the "white trail" behind the UFO tests)
-144-240hz
-24" and 27"
-1080p and 1440p respectively from the above
NO VAs coz of smearing and NO OLEDs coz of burn in ("OH BUT NEW PANELS LASTS LONGER!"...Yeah!... UNTIL STUFF HAPPENS!!!)
Uses: Everything Adobe, CLIP STUDIO PAINT, Paint Tool SAI 2, browsing, Youtube and series, then general overall gaming (Fast paced story FPSs, RTS, platforms, action, etc...No plans for MOBA/FORTNITE nor anything around those online areas) and, optionally, dark games (ALAN WAKE 2, etc) along the use of 60hz just in case a GOG game pops up and wanna play it (Overshoot/etc sense)
I've seen the following monitors:
ASUS VG249QML5A (240hz, 24")
ASUS VG27AQL5A (200/210hz, 27")
ASUS VG27AQLM5A (300hz, 27")
A reviewer said that the 24" model has a REAL below 80% DCI-P3 (Been told it's for better colour precision) from ASUS's 88% and also said that it's only good for gaming, no productivity and also only has 240hz.
However the same guy, replying to one of my comments, has a vid of the 1st 27" model (with 200/210hz) with the monitor 95% REAL DCI-P3 (bad marketing on the 24"?) and it should be overall better, but totally didn't replied to some doubts i had (Total height when the height adjustment is at the top, along a wall of text). It even shown a black screen with a darkened out room showing that there's like no backlight bleeding and just a TINY IPS glow that shouldn't be that noticeable in real usage.
However nobody has reviews etc of the last 27" model with 300hz, not even the REAL DCI-P3 (Even tho ASUS' site shows 95%, some people finds it being lower or not..Who knows)
But i've seen the tests on the 200/210hz model and with ELMB and (or without ELMB) a Level 3-4 Overdrive it makes it so there's no overshoot (the "white halo/trail" the UFO test leaves behind, something that i kinda have with my TN monitor). Instead the UFO's insides gets blurred out instead but nothing much that would , maybe, hurt the overall gaming experience?
You can see the 1st 27" 200/210hz model here for ref. The link directs to the overshoot thing (it has english AI? audio)
So i'm not sure if the 300hz model will have a "native" 240hz mode and keep the great DCI-P3 , the minimal overshoot and all that jazz above because... Almost nobody's interested to review these monitors, only LG/MSI/GIGABYTE OLEDs
Sure, there's "Monitors unboxed" but some of it's monitors like the latest LCD GIGABYTE (QD 1440p with NO MINI LED even!) models aren't being sold in Spain yet, not even Amazon, without a marked date for us
Wanted to know if those ASUS monitors would be worth it or what would ya guys recommend within those requirements of mine?
ASUS X570 TUF GAMING PLUS, 32GB DDR4@2666 ,RYZEN 5800X3D (NO OC),GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Super GAMING OC, Western Digital Blue 4TB 5400RPM + SAMSUNG 860 EVO 500+1TB GB SSDs , OEM SATA DVD 22xNoctua NH-D15 Chromax Black, BenQ XL2420T Case: Be Quiet! DARK BASE PRO 901. PSU CORSAIR RM1200 SHIFT
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
problem solved 
