Ban Cheese doodles (Worldwide)?
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next

Ban Cheese doodles
Yes!
55%
 55%  [ 21 ]
No!
44%
 44%  [ 17 ]
Total Votes : 38

Stormwolf




Posts: 23847
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 17:12    Post subject: Ban Cheese doodles (Worldwide)?
I personally don't like the smell of Cheese Doodles, so when people eat it around me i feel sick. Smells like fart. Also, it's not healthy. So i guess it should be banned seeing as it is a hazard for those eating and those unfortunate people in the proximity of people eating it in front of them. This is how things are done now, isn't it?
Back to top
tw1st




Posts: 6112
Location: New Jersey
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 17:16    Post subject:
some men just want to watch the world burn...


| BenQ XL2420T 24" 120Hz | Ducky Shine III 9008 White LED - Brown MX | Logitech G9x |
| Corsair Carbide 400R | Asus Sabertooth z77 | i7 3770K @ 4.3Ghz - 1.200v | CM Hyper 212 Evo - Push/Pull |
| SLI eVGA 4GB GTX980 ACX SC | Vengeance 16GB RAM 1600 DDR3 | AX850w PSU | Samsung 840Pro 128GB SSD | WD Black 1TB HD |
Back to top
The_Zeel




Posts: 14922

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 17:42    Post subject:
fuck off Mad

Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51539
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 17:59    Post subject:
Hell yeah, ban that disgusting crap. Mad

2nd hand cheese noodling, the greasy fingerprints that those who eat them leave everywhere before washing their hands, public cheese noodling bejjjjjjj Vomit

Not to mention the trillions in healthcare that arise from the treatment of those who eat that life threatening stuff, etc.


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
cirithungol




Posts: 3483
Location: UK
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:07    Post subject:
You can work off fat. Let's see you work off cancer.


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:13    Post subject:
Here the stupidity about smoking and cancer :

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smokingandtobacco/smoking-and-cancer

Quote:
Thanks to years of research, the links between smoking and cancer are now very clear. Smoking is by far the most important preventable cause of cancer in the world. Smoking accounts for one in four UK cancer deaths, and nearly a fifth of all cancer cases.


So, 3 out of 4 cancer deaths aren't smoking related and 4 out of 5 cases aren't smoking related either ?

Am i the only one missing something here ?
Back to top
xxax
Banned



Posts: 2610

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:26    Post subject:
I say we ban everything that annoys me.
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:30    Post subject:
Its ok with me, but OWL cheese ballz that are in the same category must be!

Tasty Swedish ballz Smug
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:35    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
Here the stupidity about smoking and cancer :

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smokingandtobacco/smoking-and-cancer

Quote:
Thanks to years of research, the links between smoking and cancer are now very clear. Smoking is by far the most important preventable cause of cancer in the world. Smoking accounts for one in four UK cancer deaths, and nearly a fifth of all cancer cases.


So, 3 out of 4 cancer deaths aren't smoking related and 4 out of 5 cases aren't smoking related either ?

Am i the only one missing something here ?

What exactly is wrong with this (a serious question Smile)?

From what I understand: 25% of people who died of cancer, got cancer because of smoking. 20% of people who got cancer, got it because of smoking. Not everyone who gets cancer dies.

I am not seeing the issue here Smile
Back to top
The_Zeel




Posts: 14922

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:45    Post subject:
MinderMast wrote:
Sin317 wrote:
Here the stupidity about smoking and cancer :

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smokingandtobacco/smoking-and-cancer

Quote:
Thanks to years of research, the links between smoking and cancer are now very clear. Smoking is by far the most important preventable cause of cancer in the world. Smoking accounts for one in four UK cancer deaths, and nearly a fifth of all cancer cases.


So, 3 out of 4 cancer deaths aren't smoking related and 4 out of 5 cases aren't smoking related either ?

Am i the only one missing something here ?

What exactly is wrong with this (a serious question Smile)?

From what I understand: 25% of people who died of cancer, got cancer because of smoking. 20% of people who got cancer, got it because of smoking. Not everyone who gets cancer dies.

I am not seeing the issue here Smile



huh?

by that logic it would mean that more people died of cancer than got cancer...

25% of the people who got cancer because of smoking, died of cancer
20% of the people who got cancer because of smoking, got cancer

Scratch Head
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:47    Post subject:
You are seeing it wrong... it's not 25% of people who got cancer, but 25% of people who died of cancer. This is where we get conspiracy theories from.. people are so easily confused by hard data Razz

I can also break it down:
- Say 100 people got cancer. Out of those 100, 20 got cancer because of smoking.
- Out of 60 that died, 15 were the ones who got it from smoking
- To compare: 15 out of 20 "smoker cancers" were with lethal outcome.

You can't really make any conclusions without knowing the breakdown of other cancer cases, but just by seeing the share of smoking related cancer incidents increase from overall cases to deaths, you could argue that it has a relatively high lethality rate.


Last edited by MinderMast on Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:53; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:51    Post subject:
my point is,
75% of cancer deaths aren't smoking related.
80% of cancer cases aren't smoking related.
Back to top
The_Zeel




Posts: 14922

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:53    Post subject:
MinderMast wrote:
You are seeing it wrong... it's not 25% of people who got cancer, but 25% of people who died of cancer. This is where we get conspiracy theories from.. people are so easily confused by hard data Razz

I can also break it down:
- Say 100 people got cancer. Out of those 100, 20 got cancer because of smoking.
- Out of 60 that died, 15 were the ones who got it from smoking
- to compare 15 out of 20 "smoker cancers" were with lethal outcome.

You can't really make any conclusions without knowing the breakdown of other cancer cases, but just by seeing the share of smoking related cancer incidents increase from overall cases to deaths, you could argue that it has a relatively high lethality rate.


that makes more sense, your wording up there was a bit confusing.
Back to top
cirithungol




Posts: 3483
Location: UK
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:54    Post subject:
I think the more important statistic from that link is:

Quote:
The fact is that half of all smokers eventually die from cancer, or other smoking-related illnesses. And a quarter of smokers die in middle age, between 35 and 69.


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 18:57    Post subject:
The_Zeel wrote:
MinderMast wrote:
You are seeing it wrong... it's not 25% of people who got cancer, but 25% of people who died of cancer. This is where we get conspiracy theories from.. people are so easily confused by hard data Razz

I can also break it down:
- Say 100 people got cancer. Out of those 100, 20 got cancer because of smoking.
- Out of 60 that died, 15 were the ones who got it from smoking
- to compare 15 out of 20 "smoker cancers" were with lethal outcome.

You can't really make any conclusions without knowing the breakdown of other cancer cases, but just by seeing the share of smoking related cancer incidents increase from overall cases to deaths, you could argue that it has a relatively high lethality rate.


that makes more sense, your wording up there was a bit confusing.


Yeah, it kinda is confusing Very Happy
I just didn't want to go into all details, since it looked like people just need to take a closer look at a sentence again Smile
Sin317 wrote:
my point is,
75% of cancer deaths aren't smoking related.
80% of cancer cases aren't smoking related.


Okay, but what's your point exactly?
Considering all the various cancers and causes for them, 20-25% is a high enough number...
Back to top
MAD_MAX333
Moderator



Posts: 7020
Location: Toronto, Canada...eh
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 19:47    Post subject:
Ban whatever, but u come near my cheetos and ill stab jesus
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 20:03    Post subject:
my point was, it's more about fear mongering then anything else. Is smoking healthy ? Certainly not. Are your chances of dying prematurely (not natural), maybe, but probably not as considerably higher, then what they want you to believe.

Here, found this, among many other :

http://www.freedom-of-choice.com/AS3.htm

has source links etc. to WHO and other researches. Like i suspected, it's another hijacked "cause" lol.
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 20:16    Post subject:
You still dismiss 20-25% as irrelevant, basically. It's a cause in 1 out of 5 of all cancer cases, how is this a small thing? Very Happy
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 20:35    Post subject:
MinderMast wrote:
You still dismiss 20-25% as irrelevant, basically. It's a cause in 1 out of 5 of all cancer cases, how is this a small thing? Very Happy


Quote:
All cancers combined account for only 13% of all annual deaths, and lung cancer only 2%
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 20:45    Post subject:
And to add to your stats:
Quote:
The most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide are lung (1.61 million, 12.7% of the total), breast (1.38 million, 10.9%) and colorectal cancers (1.23 million, 9.7%). The most common causes of cancer death are lung cancer (1.38 million, 18.2% of the total), stomach cancer (738,000 deaths, 9.7%) and liver cancer (696,000 deaths, 9.2%).

You can argue all you want about how small it is, but it's at the top of the god damn list either way...
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 20:52    Post subject:
yeah, but as usual it's all about numbers and people taking them totally out of context.

Don't wanna smoke ? Good, that's your choice. But stop telling me i can't and throw numbers taken totally out of context at me.

That's all i am saying.
Back to top
MinderMast




Posts: 6172

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 21:03    Post subject:
To be fair, you presented the first numbers as some kind of proof yourself (and I actually had to explain their context to you Razz). And when it didn't suit you, you brought in different numbers.
So, basically, you are the one throwing numbers around and then just end it with "I don't care and I do what I want".

I am not on the side of banning it flat out, but you can't expect people to be happy with "look, there's only like 2% chance that you will die of lung cancer because I can't bring myself not smoke wherever I want, so deal with it" Smile

Edit: As a disclaimer, I do realise that chances of me dying due to lung cancer because of a few chance encounters with a smoker are much lower than that, but the point is still valid in principle.
All that is being asked from either side is some consideration towards others, and for some reason everyone on each side of the argument believes it's all up to the other side Smile
Back to top
Ghworg




Posts: 925

PostPosted: Mon, 29th Jul 2013 23:17    Post subject:
cirithungol wrote:
I think the more important statistic from that link is:

Quote:
The fact is that half of all smokers eventually die from cancer, or other smoking-related illnesses. And a quarter of smokers die in middle age, between 35 and 69.


69 is middle age?
That wouldn't be good, then most people die (not just the smoking ones) before they are even past middle age Sad
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65135
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Tue, 30th Jul 2013 00:11    Post subject:
People around me can devour tonnes of these cheese doodles, just don't touch my stuff with them cheese-flavoured greasy hands and we'll get along just fine xD
Back to top
kumkss




Posts: 4838
Location: Chile
PostPosted: Tue, 30th Jul 2013 04:55    Post subject:
voted yes! can't stand them... Vomit
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 30th Jul 2013 05:14    Post subject:
That shit is gross. I find it as disgusting as bodily hair.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Acer




Posts: 3156

PostPosted: Tue, 30th Jul 2013 08:52    Post subject:
But its the next best thing if you want to experience the smell of pussy on your fingers Crying or Very sad


Dont mess with God, he can impregnate your girlfriend/wife without taking his pants off!
Back to top
JahLux
Banned



Posts: 3705

PostPosted: Wed, 31st Jul 2013 13:54    Post subject:
The_Zeel wrote:
fuck off Mad



lol typical muricah, cover everything in chocolate Vomit
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Wed, 31st Jul 2013 13:58    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
my point was, it's more about fear mongering then anything else. Is smoking healthy ? Certainly not. Are your chances of dying prematurely (not natural), maybe, but probably not as considerably higher, then what they want you to believe.

Here, found this, among many other :

http://www.freedom-of-choice.com/AS3.htm

has source links etc. to WHO and other researches. Like i suspected, it's another hijacked "cause" lol.

Cancer is not the only health issue linked to smoking.
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24321
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Wed, 31st Jul 2013 14:33    Post subject:
But it's bullshit fearmongering.

They proved now, that second hand smoke is basically a big hoax and it doesn't affect anyone on a health level.

Don't get me wrong, i'm all about not smoking in a restaurant (or heck, inside), but people bringing up bullshit reasons is just ... too much of the same.

hearth disease is one (or the ) top killers. So lets forbid all fatty and salty food from now. Then there is diabetes, so lets forbid all sugar loaded foods and then there is ... and ... and ... so lets forbid everything.

Oh and and don't forget about Air (O2) and oxidation .. so lets forbid breathing ...
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - The Useless Void Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group