| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 22:44 Post subject: Sex with animals linked to penis cancer |
|
 |
http://weirdnews.about.com/b/2011/11/14/bestiality-alert-sex-with-animals-can-give-you-cancer.htm
| Quote: | Watch out zoophiliacs -- there's a risk to animal sex, and it goes far beyond finding yourself listed here as a weird news item: A new report finds that people who engage in bestiality have double the risk of penis cancer.
"We think that the intense and long-term SWA [sex with animals] practice could produce micro-traumas in the human penile tissue," study author Stenio de Cassio Zequi, a Brazilian urologist, told LiveScience.
"The genital mucus membranes of animals could have different characteristics from human genitalia, and the animals' secretions are probably different from human fluids. Perhaps animal tissues are less soft than ours, and non-human secretions would be toxic for us."
Blech.
Naturally, bestiality fans aren't taking this one lying down. Or... umm... nevermind.
"Expecting people who truly love animals to give up their sexuality and nature just because of some physical dangers would be as absurd as expecting gays to become straight because of AIDS," Sallie Graves, a member of the pro-zoophilia group Equality For All, told The Huffington Post.
She recommends condoms. I recommend not taking advice from people who have sex with animals. |

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BLaM!
VIP Member
Posts: 13818
Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 23:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
U mad ? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34197
|
Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 23:50 Post subject: |
|
 |
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:34; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Tue, 15th Nov 2011 23:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
| Ragedoctor wrote: |
Seriously though this article is fucking retarded, I wonder how they confirmed their theories. |
Precisely. I'm reading a lot of "think", "probably", "could", "maybe" and "perhaps" in this article. Hardly confidence inspiring and definitely doesn't read like ANY scientific evidence or research was done. Now I'm not defending zoophilia, but damn.. if you're going to throw out shit like "fucking animals gives you dick cancer!!11" -- at least have some confidence in your report and a buttload of evidence to back it up too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65123
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 00:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
An article clearly generated by hate, thanks for the heads up [E.F.A.]consolitis! 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 02:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
Are dolphins considered animals ? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 02:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
fuck gonna have to stop shagging the misses..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 08:13 Post subject: |
|
 |
How do they collect scientific data for this? (they obviously didn't here)
Seriously, get a group of people together and have them fuck animals and nothing else? And which animals would these be? Chickens? goats? Horses? I would think people screwing animals would have other 'not the norm' sex practices that would interfere with results.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 13:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
Pff fake. If it was true, most men would have cancer on their penis by the age of 30. Because they fuck their epidermis with no lubricant at all, at least 1 time per day, some more often.. 
| Lutzifer wrote: | | and yes, mine is only average |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 13:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well considering all the diseases humans carry, animals having sex with humans is most dangerous for the animal. And humans want to get their way so animals who prefer to have sex with humans also run the risk of getting shot. Be careful out there animals!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Invasor
Moderator
Posts: 7638
Location: On the road
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 20:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
I read about it on local news (considering the research is brazilian...). Its quite simple, actually, penile cancer rates are higher among those who confess having sex with animals. They don't know why yet, and that would be subject for another research.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
Posted: Wed, 16th Nov 2011 21:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
what goes around cums around xD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17th Nov 2011 08:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
| iconized wrote: | | Well considering all the diseases humans carry, animals having sex with humans is most dangerous for the animal. And humans want to get their way so animals who prefer to have sex with humans also run the risk of getting shot. Be careful out there animals! |
I don't know about that, Animals have a host of disease themselves that can cross over to humans. Bird flu, swine flu, monkey pox.
In a lab they would say "the nature of the disease, health of the patient and health of the host.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Thu, 17th Nov 2011 20:00 Post subject: |
|
 |
dont fuck the bitches then!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
Posted: Thu, 17th Nov 2011 21:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
| pistolshrimp wrote: | | iconized wrote: | | Well considering all the diseases humans carry, animals having sex with humans is most dangerous for the animal. And humans want to get their way so animals who prefer to have sex with humans also run the risk of getting shot. Be careful out there animals! |
I don't know about that, Animals have a host of disease themselves that can cross over to humans. Bird flu, swine flu, monkey pox.
In a lab they would say "the nature of the disease, health of the patient and health of the host. |
I wasn't exactly serious, just changed the perspective.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
Posted: Thu, 17th Nov 2011 21:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
blowjobs also cause throat-cancer. Maybe there is a connection? ASS to mouth??? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
Posted: Thu, 17th Nov 2011 23:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
Certain bacteria being transferred or so?
On the other hand I have read that swallowing seems to make women more fertile.
Formerly known as iconized
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Fri, 18th Nov 2011 18:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
| iconized wrote: | Certain bacteria being transferred or so?
On the other hand I have read that swallowing seems to make women more fertile. |
J Reprod Immunol. 2000 Mar;46(2):155-66.
Correlation between oral sex and a low incidence of preeclampsia: a role for soluble HLA in seminal fluid?
Koelman CA, Coumans AB, Nijman HW, Doxiadis II, Dekker GA, Claas FH.
Source
Department of Immunohematology and Blood Bank, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
The involvement of immune mechanisms in the aetiology of preeclampsia is often suggested. Normal pregnancy is thought to be associated with a state of tolerance to the foreign antigens of the fetus, whereas in preeclamptic women this immunological tolerance might be hampered. The present study shows that oral sex and swallowing sperm is correlated with a diminished occurrence of preeclampsia which fits in the existing idea that a paternal factor is involved in the occurrence of preeclampsia. Because pregnancy has many similarities with transplantation, we hypothesize that induction of allogeneic tolerance to the paternal HLA molecules of the fetus may be crucial. Recent data suggest that exposure, and especially oral exposure to soluble HLA (sHLA) or HLA derived peptides can lead to transplantation tolerance. Similarly, sHLA antigens, that are present in the seminal plasma, might cause tolerance in the mother to paternal antigens. In order to test whether this indeed may be the case, we investigated whether sHLA antigens are present in seminal plasma. Using a specific ELISA we detected sHLA class I molecules in seminal plasma. The level varied between individuals and was related to the level in plasma. Further studies showed that these sHLA class I molecules included classical HLA class I alleles, such as sHLA-A2, -B7, -B51, -B35 and sHLA-A9. Preliminary data show lower levels of sHLA in seminal plasma in the preeclampsia group, although not significantly different from the control group. An extension of the present study is necessary to verify this hypothesis.
that means that swallowing can prevent preeclampsia (kind of hypertensive crisis that can be dangerous to mother and baby, before delivery).
so next time fhitb and make her swallow

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73357
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 18th Nov 2011 18:13 Post subject: Re: Sex with animals linked to penis cancer |
|
 |
| consolitis wrote: | http://weirdnews.about.com/b/2011/11/14/bestiality-alert-sex-with-animals-can-give-you-cancer.htm
| Quote: | Watch out zoophiliacs -- there's a risk to animal sex, and it goes far beyond finding yourself listed here as a weird news item: A new report finds that people who engage in bestiality have double the risk of penis cancer.
"We think that the intense and long-term SWA [sex with animals] practice could produce micro-traumas in the human penile tissue," study author Stenio de Cassio Zequi, a Brazilian urologist, told LiveScience.
"The genital mucus membranes of animals could have different characteristics from human genitalia, and the animals' secretions are probably different from human fluids. Perhaps animal tissues are less soft than ours, and non-human secretions would be toxic for us."
Blech.
Naturally, bestiality fans aren't taking this one lying down. Or... umm... nevermind.
"Expecting people who truly love animals to give up their sexuality and nature just because of some physical dangers would be as absurd as expecting gays to become straight because of AIDS," Sallie Graves, a member of the pro-zoophilia group Equality For All, told The Huffington Post.
She recommends condoms. I recommend not taking advice from people who have sex with animals. |
|
Fine, I'll stop.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Posted: Fri, 18th Nov 2011 19:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
| iconized wrote: | | pistolshrimp wrote: | | iconized wrote: | | Well considering all the diseases humans carry, animals having sex with humans is most dangerous for the animal. And humans want to get their way so animals who prefer to have sex with humans also run the risk of getting shot. Be careful out there animals! |
I don't know about that, Animals have a host of disease themselves that can cross over to humans. Bird flu, swine flu, monkey pox.
In a lab they would say "the nature of the disease, health of the patient and health of the host. |
I wasn't exactly serious, just changed the perspective. |
I know. I wasn't all that serious, the article is a joke but it makes me think a bit.
I have a always been a firm believer that sex with animals is a great way to start a new epidemic. I don't put any weight on the friction aspect of his theory altho constant irritation has been linked to cancer. Like someone else mentioned men have been jacking off since the beginning of time as well... But viruses have been linked to cancer, specifically warts (papillomavirus) and herpies, HIV, so it is reasonable to link other viruses carried by animals as cancer causing, esp when you consider sex and micro tears and fluid exchange.
YEPPP.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TSR69
Banned
Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
|
Posted: Fri, 18th Nov 2011 21:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
I think I should state that we humans are also animals. Interaction between species can always cause certain bacteria or viruses (viri) to crossover. From an human perspective, we are one species and there are many other species out there. It seems easier to get infected by some kind of disease from animals because there are so many different ones. On the other hand we humans also spread diseases to other animals, like HIV.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |